Last week, S.
1520 went to Republican Pres. Donald Trump for
his signature into law. This would make small but significant changes to
fisheries management. Specifically, the Modern Fish Act would give greater
input to recreational fishing interests in determining quotas, as well as deriving
a new regime in determining limits that likely would increase them, which
probably would allow a greater amount of fishing by recreational interests.
Both industry and environmental interests opposed
the bill and a complementary
measure in the House, authored by Louisiana’s GOP Rep. Garret Graves,
as it allowed most coastal states through their regional fisheries councils to
adjust catch limits higher that likely would have favored recreational fishers.
But environmentalists
dropped resistance upon emendation of the Senate bill to remove those
provisions.
The study required could recommend that still, but recreational interests with certainly gain an advantage with the version that went through, as opposed to a reauthorization of the previous statute governing fishing. This probably means smaller shares for industry.
Besides the importance of such a measure because
of Louisiana’s extensive coastal fishing resources, political factors also
magnified the issue for the state. Not long after assuming office, the Edwards
appointee to head the Department of Wildlife and Fisheries, former Sec. Charlie
Melancon, created a stir by his strident
opposition to the ideas encapsulated in the legislation, then expressed in
a somewhat-different bill Graves had authored during the last Congress.
Eventually, for this reason and others Melancon, a
former congressman-turned-lobbyist with no experience in the area but an ally
of political interests that had aided Edwards in his election, got
the boot from Edwards two years ago. Interestingly, one of Melancon’s final
acts gutted programs popular with recreational fishers that the new legislation
encourages.
Such a distraction Melancon had become that
Edwards convinced former state Rep. Jack Montoucet to take the departmental
reins. This ended up costing Edwards a vote in the House, with Republican state
Rep. John Stefanski
replacing him.
Edwards’ opposition to Graves’ efforts never was
entirely clear, but it seemed related to a desire to spend more on government
programs wished by his base (by arguing, baselessly, that changes would cost
the state money), a dalliance with environmentalist interests who backed him on
other matters such as legacy lawsuits, and sucking up to industry interests. At
some point, he must have recognized the ruckus raised by Graves and
recreational fishers did his political profile no good, and any visible effort
to derail the coming reforms disappeared – although his only ally in the
Louisiana delegation, Democrat Rep. Cedric Richmond, helped
him go down swinging by being just one of 11 in Congress
to vote against the bill.
Whether the fight created enough enmity among
thousands of recreational fishers in the state to cost Edwards their votes next
year remains uncertain, but with a challenging reelection campaign ahead, the
needless conflict assuredly hasn’t helped.
No comments:
Post a Comment