Some obviously get it; others don’t. As activist Louisiana Democrats fall into the latter category, that only serves to reinforce the prediction made recently in this space.
The inevitable postmortems of the
collapse of their state party as a result of the blowout
GOP wins by all kinds of its candidates over all kinds of theirs came out
about the same time as the syndicated
version of this space produced its version. Some of the more thoughtful
observers, such as national political newsletter writer Stuart Rothenberg who
noted increasingly
partisan politics based upon ideological differentiation explained Rep. Bill Cassidy’s
swamping of Sen. Mary
Landrieu in her futile reelection attempt, and my
professional colleagues who understand that issue preferences are driving
more than ever voting behavior in the south and their differenences between parties have become starker as
national Democrats continue to champion ideology at odds with the majority in
Louisiana and a vast majority of its whites, creating a dilemma for the party’s
success.
But the problem facing Democrats is
that if these voices are listened to among the party’s supporters, activists,
and leaders, then they are being disregarded. Some merely misread the
environment, such as state political newsletter writer Jeremy Alford. He
explains the Landrieu blowout ultimately came because “the
GOP pushed emotion, not necessarily a candidate.” In reality, for many
voters in that contest emotion had less to do with their decision and issues more,
much more than perhaps ever for a U.S. Senate contest in the state.