This budget was in rickety shape
from the moment the FY 2015 budget went into effect, courtesy of the bizarre
fiscal structure of the state where four-fifths of revenues are dedicated to
some purpose (state- or federal-determined) and the remainder of these responsible
for health care, higher education, and constitutional offices. As problematic
as that is, it was manageable, but the legs got kicked out from under it when
extraction royalty and severance tax revenues took a nosedive due to sharply
falling oil prices.
Thus spurred ideas to balance,
leading to three interrelated aspects of the FY
2016 budget, which drops total state spending from enacted levels for FY 2015
over a billion dollars – although notably that amount still is higher than
actual spending of two years ago by about $800 million, which is an increase
about at the rate of inflation. In order to accomplish this, higher education
was reduced from FY 2015 enacted to FY 2016 budgeted almost as much in that
year as the entire $228 million (not adjusted for medical education) decline
from FY 2009-15. Only because of an assumption built in that the Legislature
would excise the refundable portion of a dozen tax credits did it not amount to
an additional $526 million cut. And the budget turned in also suggested that
the Legislature and higher education combine forces to infuse perhaps $100
million or so more in revenues into that system through various operational means
and fees.