One suit deservedly stops, another necessary one has yet to begin, and another year in Louisiana politics is under way.
As 2014 dawned, plaintiffs
alleging that Louisiana had racially gerrymandered congressional districts quietly
dropped that suit. It claimed that because of a recent judicial ruling that
declared the process of evaluating reapportionment plans was invalid, including
a portion that gave weight to creating minority-majority districts to provide
for minority representation.
But the attempt was doomed
from the start because it asked for a fundamental redefinition of redistricting
jurisprudence, essentially that judges discount inordinately other factors important
in the process and essentially take the view that if a state did not have the
same proportion of M/M districts as there was racial minorities in the
population, this alone was evidence of gerrymandering to dilute minority voting
strength. The shill involved, former head of state Democrats Chris Whittington,
put a brave face on the withdrawal, saying despite the thin jurisprudence
behind the argument that “the legal merit of the suit has never been questioned
by the clients” and asserted they simply didn’t want to do it now.