Republican Businessman Eddie Rispone filed ethics
reports that will allow him to raise money for next year’s contest. Not that he’ll
need to haul in some bucks anytime soon, as he says he already has $5 million bankrolled
for the effort.
Rispone has helped substantially Republican and
conservative causes throughout the years, and recently founded a heretofore low-key effort to counter
the Alinskyite Together Baton Rouge, but this represents his first foray for
elected office. He eventually will further explain his reasons for running, but
for now simply notes that “we can do better” than Edwards.
If that’s his attitude, this isn’t good news for Edwards. As long as GOP candidates together mount a well-funded effort and limit their friendly fire, the incumbent is the underdog. Rispone’s announcement means the party will have the resources already; $5 million directed against Edwards will reveal an awful lot of warts.
Likely Rispone will run quite seriously. Whether
he’s in it to win it is another matter. Some will draw obvious parallels to
Republican Pres. Donald Trump (except that Trump gave much more across the aisle
than has Rispone): a wealthy, politically active businessman with a
conservative message in an anti-establishment period, and will think Rispone instantly
significant in the contest.
That misreads Louisiana political culture, in the
backdrop of a state history
of candidates without elected experience, even if they spend a ton of
money, faring poorly in runs for the governorship. The personalistic nature of
that culture, with its overemphasis on personal relationships built by elected
officials, not only deemphasizes party and ideology in vote decisions but also
makes it difficult for those who haven’t made extensive connections among activists
to run competitively. Inexperienced candidates simply don’t have enough of the oxygen
monopolized by campaign veterans to fare well at the highest levels of
contests, no matter how much they spend.
As soon as a prominent elected GOP official enters
the race, Rispone will be fated to finish behind one or more such opponents,
even he if does rack up a nontrivial proportion of the vote. How he reacts in
this environment will go a long way towards deciding Edwards’ fate.
If he soldiers on, disseminating campaign communications
touting his own merits and pointing out Edwards’ many deficiencies, that spells
trouble for the incumbent. Were he instead to attack his fellow Republican challengers,
that gives Edwards a reprieve and the chance to pull a double upset. The first approach
plays for the team to win; the second goes for broke to win individually but opens
the door for the other side to triumph.
If he cares less about him specifically winning and
more about making sure his candidacy denies Edwards a second term, his impact
on the contest will far outweigh the actual number of votes he draws.
No comments:
Post a Comment