Jeffrey D. Sadow is an associate professor of political science at Louisiana State University Shreveport. If you're an elected official, political operative or anyone else upset at his views, don't go bothering LSUS or LSU System officials about that because these are his own views solely. This publishes five days weekly with the exception of 7 holidays. Also check out his Louisiana Legislature Log especially during legislative sessions (in "Louisiana Politics Blog Roll" below).
Search This Blog
29.12.16
Edwards must emulate Jindal mental health care move
It turns out that former Gov. Bobby
Jindal had it right. Now if only Louisiana’s current Gov. John Bel Edwards would
follow through.
Recently, the U.S. Department of Justice gigged
the state for excessive institutionalization of mentally ill individuals. A
letter to
Edwards noted that Louisiana maintained too few options to treat such
individuals in the community rather than in hospitals or nursing homes.
Moreover, the document noted that unless the state came to some kind of
agreement that began expanding community placements at the expense of
institutionalization, the federal government would pursue legal action.
The problem begins with Louisiana having too many
nursing home beds. Historically, public policy has favored nursing home
interests, to the absurd point now that the state pays tens of millions of
dollars annually to maintain
empty beds in private facilities. This has given the state one of the
highest per capita number of beds in
the country, ranking fourth highest among the states (2014
data) and thereby diverts dollars that could go to home- and
community-based programs.
As research
has demonstrated, if you build them, they will get filled – colloquially
known as “Roemer’s Law,” although not postulated by the former governor. Hence,
the fewer beds available, the less likely the tendency to warehouse patients
occurs. Note, however, that a certain minimum must exist to treat adequately acute
patients as opposed to their long-term care, which some
argue states do not meet that capacity currently to do so, although others
assert that when conceptually understanding that service and beds are
separate, collaborative care models can provide enough adequate service without
a dramatic increase in hospital beds.
Comparatively, Louisiana ranks decently on that
measure. In terms of total beds for acute psychiatric patients, according to somewhat
dated
but likely not largely changed data it ranks 23rd in number of
private beds and, using more recent
data, 19th in number of state beds per capita for this purpose. However, in 2010
it lagged the nation in rate of admissions among adults with a diagnosis of any
mental illness, at 1.1 percent.
The DOJ letter reveals why. With insufficient
attention paid to evaluating patients’ conditions, knowledge of options, and
existence of community supports with an eye towards their discharge, patients
get backlogged in institutions. The institutional bias keeps them first in
acute care situations too long, then puts them in institutional settings too
often – assuming that the mentally ill get to a hospital rather than
incarcerated, which also would drive down the proportion of diagnoses admitted.
The problem is not in a paucity of beds, but in practices and policies that
encourage over-bedding and makes Roemer’s Law a self-fulfilling prophecy.
All of this was secondarily on Jindal’s mind when
in 2012 he ordered
the closure of Southeast Louisiana Hospital, one of the state’s psychiatric
facilities and the main reason why the state number of beds shrunk from 903 in
2010 to 616 this year. Then, cost
considerations figured as the primary reason, with less expensive provision
available outside of government, but the Jindal Administration also noted that
the state should move away from the institutionalization model and wanted to
work more in community settings in partnership with private providers.
Naturally, special interests wedded to the
government-provision model got
all upset with the move, predicting dire consequences from it. Just as
naturally, none of that came true. Today, the St. Tammany Parish government
owns the site and has redeveloped it, featuring a private provider of both
inpatient and outpatient psychiatric treatment, lauded
by Edwards.
That’s a commitment that Edwards must continue.
While that does not necessarily mean closing either of the two remaining state
psychiatric hospitals, it does mean wiping out the institutional policy bias in
mental health care. It seems unlikely that the state can avoid federal
government legal action against it unless it does so.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment