Last
week the federal government released its long-publicized College Scorecard, promoted
multiple times by Louisiana State University System President F. King Alexander.
While not all that it promised, it still gives an instructive read on the
condition of Louisiana-based institutions of higher education.
The
web site takes some basic facts about schools, which includes all that deliver
higher education for which data were collected such as costs, graduation rates,
and subsequent graduates’ salaries, and makes them available in various
categories. For example, one could request a listing of all Louisiana senior
institutions that are not for-profit, and for each the basic facts appear.
Clicking on a specific school introduces more detailed information. However,
unlike what once was touted, the system does not stamp a grade on the school,
confining itself to information presentation.
Nonetheless,
crude metrics can be developed to assess school quality on a comparative basis.
A simple one can take three statistics – the “net price” per year (tuition and
fees plus weighed living expenses minus typical financial aid), graduation rate
(of non-transfer students), and median salary of graduates ten years after
graduation (of those who accessed financial aid) – and can compute a measure of
the salary divided by the price multiplied by the graduation rate to give a
rough measure of quality. Presumably, better schools are those that produce higher
salaries at lower pricing while graduating more students.
Obviously,
the measures
leave something to be desired. The living expenses calculations can be
unreliable. The graduation rate does not include transfer students. The
universe of students receiving financial aid differs somewhat from those that
don’t. Still, a measure can be produced of some validity to compare the state’s
non-specialty, non-for-profit baccalaureate and above universities.
Looking
at the frame as a whole of the 21 schools, generally the public,
non-historically black universities and colleges score the best, followed by
the private schools, with the HBUC schools at the bottom. HBUC schools tend to
have higher prices, lower rates, and lower salaries while the private schools
have much higher prices with rates and salaries hardly better than the public
schools. Louisiana State University Baton Rouge scores the best for its
moderate-to-high relative price, second-highest graduation rate, and third-highest
salaries. LSU Alexandria scores the lowest for price not much below LSU’s, relatively
low salary, and very low rate.
Of
more policy-making relevance is comparing these results to national figures,
for the public schools. Nationally for four-year public schools, the average
price is about $14,100, rate is 44 percent, and median salary is around
$39,900. For Louisiana, the weighed average price is just under $10,000, while
only LSU and Louisiana Tech University are above the graduation rate, with most
schools below it and some at least 10 and as many as 29 points below, and they
also are above the salary, with all but two of the others within $10,000 of
that amount. (These numbers are from 2012.)
Most
illuminating here is the relatively low price of attending university in
Louisiana. At only about 70 percent of the national average – which inherently is
adjusted for cost-of-living – this provides more evidence that the state
underprices its tuition and fees.
This
also explains why on the computed metric ten state schools score above the
national figure, despite relatively lower salaries and rates. The low price
compensates to make Louisiana colleges average values in the national pool.
These
results point the way forward for higher education policy in the state: increase
tuition and fees and use the proceeds to improve quality that results in higher
graduation rates and better quality output that draws higher salaries. This
runs counter to the prevailing orthodoxy of higher education in the state,
which overburdens taxpayers, but seems the most efficacious path to making
Louisiana higher education more than just of middling value.
No comments:
Post a Comment