If Sen. Mary Landrieu wants to create the perception that she’s identified with Louisiana rather than with Washington, D.C., standing athwart of foreign policy that helps U.S. interests just to make that point isn’t the way to do it.
For weeks all that has stood in
between the U.S. being able to levy certain sanctions against Venezuelan
individuals involved in crackdowns directed at protests against that country’s
authoritarian leaders, which would involve revoking the visas and freezing the
assets of a handful of people, has been Landrieu’s insistence that the matter
not be taken up in the Senate. Under the rules for this kind of measure that
require unanimity, she has become the only objector, claiming that these would
cost Louisianans jobs with her rationale being that these could affect
operations at a CITGO refinery
in Lake Charles, which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Venezuela’s
government-owned Petroleos de Venezuela S.A..
How intellectually she can come
to such a conclusion is known only to her. The bill
as drafted, assuming that you can conflate Venezuela’s leaders as “owning”
CITGO, does not prevent its operation in anyway – confirmed
by the Senate Foreign Relations Committee staffers involved with the bill.
But Landrieu’s office admitted they agreed with Venezuelan officials – working through
the struggling
Patton Boggs lobby firm recently acquired by Squire Sanders but retaining
as its co-lead lobbyist the guy who showed her the ropes when she got to
Washington, former Sen. John Breaux – that CITGO might conceivably someday be
considered a legal person despite the committee staffers’ reassurance.
Never mind also that the three
Republican and one Democrat senators from Texas and Illinois, which also have
CITGO refineries, don’t seem to be troubled by sanctions and their impact on
jobs. All
three are up for sale in any event because Venezuela’s socialist “Chavismo”
government policy continues to drive its economy into the ground and the
country needs hard currency even as oil prices continue to average close to
$100 a barrel as world demand grows. PDVSA also owns a half-interest in a
Chalmette refinery with Exxon, which inconsistently doesn’t seem to perturb
Landrieu relative to sanctions.
In fact, if any jobs are to be
lost, it’s much more likely that will happen by CITGO pulling the plug rather
than through sanctions. Because
of a deal made with the People’s Republic of China, it may be more
profitable if CITGO is sold in its entirety to concentrate on supplying the Red
Chinese. As a result, the entire company is up for sale, in pieces or win whole.
Unless sold by 2016, it may make more economic sense simply to close the Lake
Charles facility as Venezuela shuttles its crude elsewhere.
But none of this makes an
impression on Landrieu, who has been stung
over the past couple of months by revelations of questionable travel
expenses and whether she has become more a Washington than Louisiana resident,
so this obstinacy can be understood as a tactic purporting to show that she “cares”
about Louisiana by “protecting” vulnerable jobs. And last week Senate Republican
Marco Rubio
and House Republican Bill Cassidy,
who is her main challenger for reelection this fall, turned up the heat by questioning
where lie her policy loyalties, to which she responded
asserting the tortured, if not counter-factual, argument above.
Yet by Cassidy’s salvo, this
demonstrates that he’s not going to lay down on the issue and have her
construct a narrative at odds with reality. Indeed, he can turn it around on
her by showing she’s captive to a good-old-boy network based in Washington to
the point of constructing a false narrative that additionally serves her reelection
desires, in the process putting that personal interest ahead of U.S. interests.
If he sticks with it, the best she can hope for in terms of how the issue molds
perceptions of her candidacy is that it doesn’t move the needle against her.
So if Cassidy doesn’t cede the
field to her in this, it’s not an answer to counter incidents making her seem
more and more fraudulent that are hazardous to her political health. And given
that since the beginning of the year Landrieu
continues generally to trail Cassidy in heads-up polling, on this issues that’s
not the outcome she wants.
No comments:
Post a Comment