The survey
by Baton Rouge businessman Lane Grigsby did not have heartening news for Sen. Mary Landrieu. She
received an overall favorable approval rate of 56 percent, but when considering
reelection, more crucial to understanding those chances comes from evaluating her
against a field and not in isolation. Even with a sample tilted a bit towards
Democrat candidates, against any generic candidate more than a third of the sample
said straight out it would not vote for her, barely fewer than said they would
definitely vote for her reelection in 2014 (and a small
improvement over her worse numbers two years ago).
Five years ago, against a weak
liberal-Democrat-turned-populist-conservative-Republican state Treasurer John
Kennedy, she managed to pull out a five-point win with polls in the months
prior to the election averaging
her vote to reelect rate around 45 percent in a favorable electoral
climate. Neither condition exists at this time.
The environment for her is lousy. Besides having no presidential
coattails and fighting the trend that the biggest losses to the president’s
party in Congress occurs during the sixth year of an administration, one big
reason why appears to be in trouble is the long public memory of her
as the decisive vote to pass the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
(“Obamacare”), which the survey showed still is deeply unpopular in Louisiana.
Only now are its provisions even starting to kick in, and yet 55 percent said
they were less likely to vote for her as a result of that with the more onerous
parts of it to come into effect before election day, so it’s only going to
become a heavier albatross around her neck as time passes.
Nor can she count on lackluster challengers unable to match her
resources. At this point, deep-pocketed Rep. Bill Cassidy, a
Republican medical doctor, will challenge her, and another deep-pocketed GOP M.D. Rep. John Fleming is edging
closer to running all the time. Either has the credibility, experience, and
resources to tee off on her on Obamacare and other issues, so she will catch a
quality opponent to her detriment. There’s no other way to put it: an incumbent
that cannot get at least 40 percent of a friendly sample to pledge reelection
support to her is a candidacy on life support – much less one contending against
quality opponents under tough conditions.
By contrast, the poll carried good news for Republican Sen. David Vitter, thought to be
giving serious consideration to running for governor in 2015. While several
other statewide elected officials also appear to mull the option, such as
Kennedy, Lt. Gov. Jay
Dardenne, and Agriculture Secretary Mike
Strain, Vitter’s approval rating topped Landrieu’s by about a point and
only Dardenne’s of this group slightly exceeded his.
Vitter should smile about this because the potential opponent he would
need to worry the least about is Dardenne. Loosely, the statewide elected
officials said interested can be argued to represent three different wings of
the state Republicans: Kennedy the populist conservatives, Strain the principled
conservatives, and Dardenne the moderate conservatives and non-conservatives.
But Vitter’s advantage is, better than any Republican in the state’s history,
he can tie together the populist and principled wings of the party. He’s a
bedrock conservative (a lifetime American Conservative Union rating, where 100
is scored as an unblemished conservative voting record, of 93.36)
yet will take a populist stance now and then, such as in championing
drug re-importation and advocating
more regulation of larger banks. As long as he remains more popular than
the likes of Kennedy and Strain, as the poll shows he is and he has the
resources and experience to keep it that way, they get squeezed out.
Yet Dardenne remains his weakest challenger so long as Democrats insist
on running one or more of their own candidates. State Rep. John Bel Edwards
already
has pledged to run, and if he remains true to his word, he will poach votes
from Dardenne from the left while Vitter slices them from the right, leaving
Dardenne out in the cold.
No comments:
Post a Comment