A tragic mass shooting in a public school need not act as the only trigger to reevaluate security measures in Louisiana. But we must recognize that, until gun control restrictions are relaxed in Louisiana, these measures do little to prevent these kinds of tragedies.
School districts around the Baton
Rouge area report
increased vigilance and are taking another look at their school security
policies in the wake of the recent incident in Connecticut where a mentally
ill individual, after killing his mother, shot up a school. The
semi-automatic weapon used is available in most states for carry as a concealed
weapon for qualified users, where no state allows permitting of concealed carry
by somebody with a history of mental illness.
The districts report increased
visitation of security officers at schools and a review of emergency review
plans. There is talk about increasing officer presence. Unfortunately, while
these measures are better than nothing to reduce the possibility of a horrific
event occurring, they are next to nothing in effectively dealing with the
situation.
It’s helpful to review the facts
about those involved in these kinds of shootings, where one or more individuals
decide to target randomly individuals. (Much of the following material is drawn
from David Kopel’s Dec. 17, 2012 piece
in the Wall Street Journal. Regular
readers know typically in this space that hyperlinks abound to demonstrate
source material. Yet this citation should not just be read out of curiosity; if
anybody wishes to be able to speak intelligently and factually about the gun
control debate, they cannot unless they understand the material in this piece –
as opposed to this
effort.). They are: there is association between deinstitutionalization of
the mentally ill and the number of these acts, while none exists between
strength of gun control laws and the number; that the mentally ill get access
to these weapons despite strict gun control regimes such as Connecticut’s, that
with impunity they ignore laws prohibiting concealed weapons in certain areas, and
that the perpetrators typically are dissuaded instantly by any show of
countervailing force.
So, the correct policy would be
in vulnerable areas where many gather to create conditions that maximize the
ability to dissuade those with evil intent and to apply counterforce quickly.
Which is exactly what Louisiana law
regarding schools and colleges does not do.
State law prohibits all but public
safety officials (on or off duty) from having concealed weapons, or any kind of
firearm. Further, as far as enforcement goes, these zones are nothing more than
irresponsible shams in that they create a false sense of security. No Louisiana
school of any kind has the necessary security measures, such as metal detectors
at every entrance and sufficient armed security patrolling, to enforce these
zones in an adequate manner.
In fact, adequate measures would make
schools little more than prison-like. In the 2008 shooting at
Baton Rouge Community College, campus police responded in less than 4
minutes – about 3.5 minutes after a woman committed suicide, after killing two
of her classmates, which would have left plenty of time for a determined
evildoer to shoot plenty of more people. Unless incredibly intrusive and
expensive, there’s no way patrol could nip these incidents in the bud.
Yet the incredible irony is that
these same laws disarm qualified individuals from providing the exact relief
needed in these extremely rare but incredibly high-stakes situations, even as
these do nothing to discourage those individuals with malign intent. And it’s
not like there haven’t been attempts to change the situation to allow concealed
carry into universities, for example. A couple of times in the past five years
bills have been argued in the Legislature to grant
this on campuses, but, incredibly, have been opposed by both university
officials and public safety representatives, leading to their failure.
To some degree, opposition from
these quarters is understandable. They wish to monopolize use of force to
protect themselves in the line of duty. But this perspective to maximize police safety is incompatible with maximizing
public safety.
No comments:
Post a Comment