Simien win challenges GOP mayor race success

Earlier this month, the election of independent Marshall Simien, Jr. to the Lake Charles mayoralty marked a curious outlier to recent success that Republicans and white candidates generally have had in Louisiana’s largest cities, and may flash a warning signal to them.

Simien defeated two-term incumbent Republican Nic Hunter in the May 3 runoff. While Hunter’s proportion of the vote barely increased from what he gathered in the Mar. 29 general election, Simien’s essentially corralled support from all others, making up more than an 18-percentage point gap. Hunter is white while Simien, who among other elected and appointed positions in government served a couple of terms on the City Council prior to a previous mayoral run in 2017, is black.

Until May, Republicans had hit their high-water mark in executive control of the ten most populated cities (in a trio of cases, consolidated with the parish) in the state. While New Orleans had a Democrat as mayor, all of Baton Rouge, Shreveport, Lafayette, St. George (newly a city with an elected mayor as of March), Lake Charles, Kenner and Bossier City – second through eighth in population – had Republican chief executives. Monroe had an independent and Alexandria a Democrat.

Stipend extension not best pay raise strategy

By inserting the stipend Louisiana public school employees have enjoyed for the past two years into the budget for next year, legislators may end up writing checks with their mouths that later they can’t cash.

Somewhat surpassingly, the fiscal year 2026 budget contains, for a third year in a row, a $2,000 stipend for educators and $1,000 for staff. Extending it one more year wasn’t supposed to happen in the wake of the defeat of a constitutional amendment that used educational trust funds to pay down unfunded accrued liabilities in pension plans, which then would have the leftover funds no longer encumbered at the local level passed along into permanent raises.

But House Republicans pulled a rabbit from their hat when the Appropriations Committee, with full support of its Democrats, included the raises again. It took near-magic to do so: blocking $91 million dollars in funding for new vehicle and heavy equipment purchases for state agencies, cutting $26 million dollars in benefits for ineligible Medicaid recipients, plowing in $20 million dollars because of a hiring freeze, by paying down debt early to save $25 million dollars in interest, and halting a $30 million intensive tutoring program in the Department of Education.

Unaccountable Port lobbies to keep privileges

Perhaps it should not surprise that the most secretive local government in northwest Louisiana, the Port of Caddo-Bossier, has been involved some double-secret moves, if not backed by misinformation whether intentionally deceptive, by officials in area local governments.

The Port was established over 60 years ago to govern commerce and traffic as a port. Practically speaking, this means it builds infrastructure around land it leases to tenants. It is governed by a commission of nine appointees, political insiders all, by Shreveport, Bossier City, Caddo Parish, and Bossier City. It rakes in the statutory maximum of 2.5 mills of property tax from residents in those parishes. That’s good enough to gather over $7 million annually and to acquire assets of over $200 million while on the hook for $58 million in debt (2023 numbers; those for 2024 were presented at today’s meeting). (That debt will increase, perhaps substantially, as at its April meeting besides officially levying the property tax for 2025 it also authorized up to $750 million in new debt issuance.)

But statute also gives it enormous powers over what is defined as the “port area” – Bossier and Caddo Parishes in their entirety – and protects it from interference from any other local government. Following a 2021 law that added that and extensively expanded its powers, that gives it pretty free run to do whatever, at whatever cost. For example, it snookered Bossier City into giving it potentially a free waterworks that, unless some unlikely assumptions transpire, will be a net cost to Bossier Citians. It also has the power to expand through expropriation unhindered by any other local government, and, as an economic development entity, to make deals out of view of taxpayers.

Good bill advances DEI shuttering in education

The substitute bill for Republican state Rep. Emily Chenevert’s HB 421 finishes an incomplete job in a way that promotes unbiased learning and respectful treatment of individuals.

The bill, which advanced, on a party-line vote in the House and Governmental Affairs Committee with all from the GOP in favor, in the form of substitute as it met with substantial change, prohibits public colleges’ instructional content that relates to concepts of critical race theory, white fragility, white guilt, systemic racism, institutional racism, anti-racism, systemic bias, implicit bias, unconscious bias, intersectionality, gender identity, allyship, race-based reparations, race-based privilege, or the use of pronouns; and in promoting the differential treatment of any individual or group of individuals based on race or ethnicity, imputed bias, or other ideology related to diversity, equity, or inclusion; or any course with a course description, course overview, course  objectives, proposed student learning outcomes, written examinations, or written or oral assignments that include this content  The original form of the bill included only a prohibition against preferential treatment by suspect categories by state government agencies, but added to that dismantling parts of any state government agency involved in these activities and oversight of this by the Legislative Auditor with possible corrective actions by the majoritarian branches.

On the latter score, it significantly improves upon actions – in the case of the Louisiana State University System, but inaction by the other three higher education management boards – to eliminate in name these concepts and applications of these that collectively are known as diversity, equity, and inclusion practices. DEI assumes that non-minority race or sex individuals by nature unreasonably discriminate against others and therefore government must bestow privileges on the other individuals to account for the difference.

Vanity only reason for Edwards Senate run

This might be fun, to see perhaps the most arrogant, partisan, and fraudulent governor in Louisiana history getting his ego busted.

It appears that Democrat former Gov. John Bel Edwards has held multiple conversations with Democrat Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer about running for GOP Sen. Bill Cassidy’s seat in 2026. It’s not clear who is courting whom, but the electoral map is such that for Democrats to take control of the chamber they would have to have an extremely good election night, which means recruiting candidates that stand at least a ghost of a chance of winning. Seemingly, Edwards said to check back with him later this summer.

Edwards doesn’t fall into that category. He rode into office presenting himself as a generic blank slate but in a manner to make voters think he was conservative by emphasizing alleged traditional social values. He became the only governor ever to win reelection with fewer votes than he did upon initial consecutive election (although that’s a small sample size given that was not possible constitutionally until 1975), barely skating back in by riding the Trump 45 economic recovery wave (even as within the state he pursued an agenda at odds with the ideas that triggered it).

LPSC must prompt pivot away from renewable energy

While both American Electric Power and the Southwest Power Pool made mistakes that led to a blackout under good weather conditions in northwest Louisiana, the most prominent reason should serve as a warning going forward to state policy-makers.

AEP’s subsidiary Southwestern Electric Power last month had to cut power to around 30,000 people, most in Bossier Parish, for a few hours despite no damage from weather or other sources. It had to at the behest of SPP, because there wasn’t enough power available in SWEPCO’s service area. Trying to draw too much from outside wouldn’t have helped, and more from within would have been as likely to cause cascading failures within the service area.

SWEPCO came up short because it had taken offline temporarily some generation locations for maintenance. This act had been planned months in advance with the expectation that mild spring weather would place low demand on electricity, thus the reduced capacity still could serve all demand. However, unexpectedly high temperatures in the SWEPCO service abrogated that plan and forced the blackout.

LA welfare policy must promote, not pander

So, let’s get this straight: not only must Louisiana taxpayers continue to bestow gifts, but that the receivers get to tell what gifts and in a manner that costs taxpayers even more?

More evidence about just how far off the rails the political left has gone in Louisiana, and America, came at a Louisiana Senate committee hearing last week where it claimed taxpayers should continue to facilitate poorer health outcomes. This came over debate about SB 14 by Republican state Sen. Patrick McMath, a bill that would disallow public schools from serving meals that contain ingredients nutrition experts have identified as encouraging chronically bad health conditions and to start a process to remove soft drinks from eligibility for Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program purchases, which also contain some of the cited ingredients.

According to extremely old data, about half of all Louisiana students attend schools qualifying for Title I assistance, meaning eligibility for provision of breakfast and/or lunch for free. About a fifth of Louisianans participate in SNAP, which nationally costs almost $113 billion in 2023.

Alarmists hoisted on own petard by hidden report

As it turns out with the now-halted and controversial Mid-Barataria Sediment Diversion Project, the climate alarmism behind it injected into its formation by the Democrat former Gov. John Bel Edwards Administration ended up hoisting it onto its own petard into suspension, if not downsizing or even termination.

Upon taking office, Republican Gov. Jeff Landry expressed skepticism that the project, the initial stages of which were underway and which would cost $3 billion. Its goal was to divert sediment from the Mississippi River at points around 60 to 70 miles above its outlet into the Barataria Basin in order to rebuild about 21 square miles of land over 50 years. However, there would be spillover effects including destruction of marine habitats that would disrupt oyster and shrimping industries plus other marine life (pushing one species to the brink of extinction) and disrupting negatively flood insurance administration in Plaquemines Parish which would bear the brunt of and opposed from the start the project. The final analysis of it concluded that it would convey slightly higher benefits compared to costs in resources and damage.

Then last month Landry announced a halt of work on it. Last week, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers revoked the environmental permit associated with it, citing the suspension. But it also listed other factors into the decision, including that the state “deliberately withheld information … that the state knew it should provide … [for] consideration whether to include that information” for the purposes of issuing the permit. In other words, the Edwards Administration deceptively kept information from the Corps that could have altered the final decision.

Marching term limits bills to worry Bossier jurors

Don’t look now, Bossier Parish Police Jury, but term limits may be headed your way, if momentum takes hold from actions of one of its own parish’s state senators on behalf of other parishes.

This week, SB 103 and SB 113 both advanced onto the Senate floor. Both bills, sponsored by Republican state Sen. Alan Seabaugh, would call for votes to impose term limits on the police juries in Sabine and De Soto Parishes, respectively. No parish governed under state statutes as yet has term limits, although Lincoln Parish may do so under statute but that depends upon its jury calling for an election, which it has not yet.

Something to that effect happened in De Soto, where in February of last year the five Republican and one no party jurors voted in favor to authorize the jury president to request the legislation, against the five Democrats. SB 113 would establish a three-term limit prospectively presumably if approved for 2028 and beyond. It represents a switch from a 7-4 defeat only months earlier, where in the meantime elections occurred and while a couple of holdover jurors swapped votes, two long-time (32 and 20 years) incumbents who had voted against in 2023 were defeated by newcomers who voted for in 2024.

No back door to universal closed primaries in LA

More well-read advocates of closed party primaries in Louisiana, particularly Republicans, may have become excited needlessly by a recent, if misleading, article about the possibility of applying these to all elective offices in Louisiana by the waving of a magical judicial wand.

Last year, when state lawmakers made considerable revisions to election process, they carved out closed primaries for certain offices – U.S. Senate, U.S. Representative, the Board of Elementary and Secondary Education, the Public Service Commission, and the Supreme Court, joining that of presidential electors – while excluding any local, all other judicial, statewide single executive, and legislative offices. Conservative activists in particular were pleased to see this move away from the state’s nonpartisan/nonpreference election system – technically not even a primary election (although often referred to as a “blanket primary”) but rather a general election with the possibility of a runoff where candidates regardless of party affiliation ran together – as it would produce candidates with greater ideological fidelity without members of the other major party able to exert influence selection of favored candidates.

Party activists generally had hoped to see closed primaries applied to all elections, but political realities – specifically, the legislators and governor involved in making this change all had come into office under the blanket primary, so they felt their office selection method not broken and needing no fixing – intruded. But recently, some false hope was offered for extension of closed primaries from a posting by a special interest group advocating legal and policy reforms through increased transparency.

For BC, stronger term limits = better govt

If Bossier Citians really want to disable endless insider government of their city, they’ll need to vote this Saturday for the two ballot propositions at their local precinct that will put in place the most restrictive term limits in the country save those of the U.S. presidency.

On Mar. 29, voters approved ballot propositions that installed three consecutive term limits starting with councilors’ and Republican Mayor Tommy Chandler’s assumption (reassumption for Chandler and three councilors) of office on Jul. 1. But this May 3, just weeks later, they’ll be asked to approve two other propositions – the only items on their ballots – that would bring about three term limits for life, retroactively. That means Chandler and the three councilors can run for reelection only once more successfully or, if they defer then, they can run just once more successfully at any time in the future.

At first glance, voters may be temped to shrug off trooping to the polls just for these two items, reckoning that term limits, if less restrictive, already are in place. However, they need to consider the case of current and outgoing GOP Councilor David Montgomery.

Lawmakers look set to make bad laws stink less

After years of trying, two of the most odious laws regarding motor vehicle operation designed primarily as revenue grabs appear to be on the verge of amelioration, although if legislators have real fortitude to follow through they would neuter these completely.

SB 99 by Republican state Sen. Stewart Cathey provides further deterrent to the use of traffic enforcement cameras, following up on changes last year. Those alterations, in providing increased due process protections, also increased expenses to local governments making use of these less attractive. The bill would increase the deterrent by subjecting officials of the jurisdictions using these to malfeasance charges, which Cathey thought would improve matters as he perceived many of the provisions recently enacted were being ignored – which has validity, if a recent incident of an egregious violation of the law in West Baton Rouge Parish is any indicator.

Speed cameras still would be legal, however, and more loophole closings could be employed that both make revenue generation for its own sake more difficult and allow for greater due process. The bill could be amended to mandate requirements of (1) taking pictures both of license plates and faces (2) that must be clearly recognizable after review by a police officer verified by a city or district judge (3) from a camera proven calibrated accurately taking only vehicle and people photos only during posted times (4) subject to criminal, not civil, proceedings in order to get a conviction.

Unneeded law school in NW LA would waste money

Other than both employment and financial data not backing the idea, putting a state-supported law school in small-town northwest Louisiana might work.

Last week, Northwestern State University in Natchitoches announced it would seek establishment of a law school on its campus stating in fewer than 18 months. That would constitute a Herculean effort to have the necessary resources obtained, several faculty members hired, and accreditation secured. It would be the first located not in New Orleans, where there are private Tulane and Loyola, or Baton Rouge, where there are public Louisiana State University and Southern University.

For decades, complaints have circulated in the northern part of the state that not being near a state law school hampered provision of legal services. The Metroplex and Little Rock were the next closest locations for much of the area, and these out-of-state locations weren’t much closer than the state’s two largest cities for most living in the area. NSU alleges it has letters of support from lawyers in the area.

College crisis will deepen without big change

That the severe financial struggles at the University of New Orleans now have been joined by those at the University of Louisiana Monroe send yet another warning signal about how Louisiana higher education will face rough waters for years to come unless some basic rethinking and restructuring occur.

Problems cropped up years ago at UNO as its student population dipped precipitously in the wake of the hurricane disasters of 2005, with that number falling some five-eighths since the fall, 2004 semester. ULM’s problems have not been so enrollment-related, with its number down just a percentage point over the two decades, but it has seen a six percent decline since the Wuhan coronavirus pandemic began plus it has seen a significant falloff in its doctorate-level pharmacy graduate program.

And, both made mistakes that translated into financial problems. For example, UNO got away from the basics and flirted with new trendy/boutique programs, while ULM picked up a white elephant building that causes spending in the red on its behalf.

Easter Sunday, 2025

This column publishes five days weekly after noon U.S. Central Time (maybe even after sundown on busy days, or maybe before noon if things work out, or even sometimes on the weekend if there's big news) except whenever a significant national holiday falls on the Monday through Friday associated with the otherwise-usual publication on the previous day (unless it is Thanksgiving Day, Independence Day, Christmas, or New Year's Day when it is the day on which the holiday is observed by the U.S. government). In my opinion, in addition to these are also Easter Sunday, Memorial Day and Veterans' Day.

With Sunday, Apr. 20 being Easter, I invite you to explore this link.

Bossier school pay hike product of politics

Now, was that so difficult? But why didn’t happen sooner and without being told once and warned again not to hike taxes to do it?

Last week, the Bossier Parish School Board sprung pay raises onto district employees. Starting next academic year, educators would receive $2,500 more annually, while other personnel would net 4.75 percent more. The cost will start at $10.6 million more annually.

Of course, among staff and school board members many risked breaking their arms trying to pat themselves on their own backs so vigorously. Most obsequious in effusive praise was Superintendent Jason Rowland, who surely brought tears to the eyes of all involved when he talked lovingly about how the board “cares so much about their [sic] school system.” Closely following him on that score was Republican Member Erick Falting, who a few months ago berated taxpayers for not coughing up more tax dollars to let him spend more, relating how pleased as punch he was to see this happen.

Chance to end wasteful tax credit needs taking

Two bills enter, one bill leaves. But one would be a far better choice than the other regarding Louisiana’s wasteful Motion Picture Production tax credit.

Now almost a quarter-century old, the controversial program that over the years has cost taxpayers billions of dollars going almost exclusively to wealthy, out-of-staters, as in almost every year, this year faces reform efforts in the state Legislature to repair its loss to taxpayers of 60 cents on the buck. Two bills seek to make changes, with both sponsors interestingly next-door neighbors in northwest Louisiana.

SB 232 by Republican state Sen. Adam Bass is by far the most anodyne of the pair, and if anything possibly goes backwards if evaluated on reducing corporate welfare. It loosens several restrictions in current law, such as a cap on awards to a project, while transferring operation of it to the Department of Economic Development but maintains the maximum 40 percent rebate on production expenses. It appears to be an attempt to create more flexibility in the credit’s administration geared towards genuine economic development benefitting state residents rather than a bribe to anybody willing to make a film or television series.

Make LA Healthy Again bills deserve support

References that Republican Gov. Jeff Landry made in his state of the state speech earlier this week to “Make Louisiana Healthy Again” may have puzzled many viewers, but it could become a significant game-changer for both state finances and its population’s health if done right.

Landry mentioned only three specific agenda items in his address, spending much time on insurance reforms, and briefly mentioning the reorganizing the Department of Transportation and Development, with references to the offshoot of the national government version of Make America Healthy Again in between in duration. Its goal is to have government incentivize nutrition consumption habits that produce positive health outcomes.

Half a century ago, the concept bowdlerized as “you are what you eat” was backed with little study and took on the aura of being nothing much more than an extension of anti-capitalist hippie musings (perhaps it didn’t help that one of the earliest progenitors of advocacy for dietary ingredients as a significant contributor to health and longevity, Dr. Andrew Weil, then was involved heavily in research involving psychotropic drugs and using them personally). There’s still quite a bit of shaky (“nutty” also is accurate but too bad of a pun) sentiments pronounced by people associated with this, such as a belief that catastrophic anthropogenic global warming will come if people keep eating meat (too much methane from livestock) but removing evidence-free and politicized hyperbolism allows genuinely scientific-based elements to come forward.

Landry may pull rabbit out on coastal suits

Another “middle way” strategy by Republican Gov. Jeff Landry, implemented before he was governor, may end up backfiring – or perhaps could pay off depending upon the inclinations of his ally GOP Pres. Donald Trump; just follow the money.

At present, Landry is battling to put an insurance reform package into law, one that he proclaims casts a pox on both houses of insurers and trial lawyers for practices he claims needlessly drive up the cost of insurance. The move is somewhat of a gamble, as in comparison to other states’ laws where insurance rates are much lower Louisiana’s encourages litigation and Landry’s agenda doesn’t appear to move the needle enough to substantially reduce rates through measures discouraging litigation while not discouraging industry participation.

But this isn’t the first time Landry tried to find a path between opposing sides of an issue. As attorney general, he tried to discourage the state from intervening legally against energy companies which was alleging, along with coastal parishes, that explorers had caused coastal damage through activities illegal or without permission under state law. Use of state resources this way was part of his predecessor Democrat Gov. John Bel Edwards’ sue-and-settle strategy: treat these firms as piñatas to be busted open for cash by allying with plaintiffs, use the state’s notoriously plaintiff-generous/jackpot justice courts to come up with a judgment against the target, and then work out a semi-extortionist agreement using the judgment as the hammer waiting to come down, with appellate prospects uncertain, that shovels settlement money to plaintiffs – in this case, government.

Landry stakes much in annual governor address

Republican Gov. Jeff Landry’s State of the State address was the longest in recent history, and perhaps the most fraught with political peril for its speaker.

Much of what he spoke about tended very much in the other direction. He had plenty of good economic news that he used to draw a deep contrast with conditions under his predecessor Democrat former Gov. John Bel Edwards, who typically used his such speeches to stump for tax increases, higher costs for doing business, and greater government largesse accompanied by bigger government. That Louisiana depopulated and sank on most economic indicators during those eight years testify to the refreshing change Landry and a Legislature with more inspired leadership and membership to follow to have implemented a (so far, slightly) smaller and smarter government agenda.

In another area and less obviously, Landry drew another contrast. Edwards and his leftist allies ran a con game about health care, where they defined higher spending on it and to more people as a badge of compassion, regardless of the counterproductivity and wastefulness of that approach (consistent with liberal ideology) that abandons any attempt to infuse personal responsibility into the health care equation.

Landry cannot avoid choice on tort reform

Republican Gov. Jeff Landry faces the biggest political test of his career, one that if he fails largely cancels his ambitions of becoming a transformative Louisiana chief executive, if not risks his reelection.

That is, how can he balance the interests of trial lawyers who contributed to his election against the greater part of those mainly responsible for that very election? It is a political problem that will require a political solution where one side has to win.

Landry tried to halve the baby at a recent news conference where he declared he had a “balanced” approach to tort reform. The issue increasingly has become supercharged in the state as it continues to have among the highest vehicle insurance rates among the states, with much higher rates compared to other states of similar size, urbanization, and with populations of equivalent socioeconomic status.

BC rottenness becoming harder to hide

As the Bossier City political insider world continues to crumble, what once could be sidestepped in darkness and silence increasing becomes blatant revealing the rottenness of the entire structure.

The legal ramifications of this worldview and attitude were on full display at the City Council meeting this week. The first hint came with an agenda item telling the world the Council would head into executive session to discuss what was called potential litigation. This is permissible under state public meetings law that shields content about a limited range of topics including legal and personnel actions.

The matters included city money spent on rehabilitation of parking lots supposedly damaged by construction on the nearby Walter O. Bigby Carriageway, but under questionable circumstances that reek of favoritism and cutting corners. More specifically, Republican Councilor David Montgomery had advocated publicly and vociferously for expensive roads work that could increase access to a single business – one owned by a longstanding friend of his who also has a close friendship with an employee in the city’s Public Works Department. Refurbishing and connecting the parking lot of that business, Scot’s Audio, to another, Bossier Power Equipment’s also rehabilitated, would accomplish that objective. Whether related, City Attorney Charles Jacobs, his assistant Richard Ray, and with the approval of Republican Mayor Tommy Chandler but without proper due diligence, authorized the work and in a way that may have violated public bid law.

Ganja, hemp bills to do little to kill LA's buzz

If you can’t keep Louisianans from getting high legally, maybe you can discourage them by taxing one form more, somelegislators hope.

Ever since the institution of medical marijuana in Louisiana almost a decade ago, and a few years later legalizing sale of consumable hemp products, it’s been easier than ever to go around in a haze without legal repercussions. In the case of medical marijuana, what started as a tightly-controlled regime somewhat based upon science that shows marijuana provides almost no genuine medical benefits of any kind has become a free-for-all where just about anybody can get as much as they want for whatever reason they want. The trend continued last year where a couple of new laws extended the program to 2030 and eased some administrative burdens, although at least lawmakers didn’t go for complete legalization.

Complete legalization, limited only in respect as being termed a “pilot program,” is back on the table this term from HB 627 by Democrat state Rep. Candice Newell, who brought the legalization effort last year. Should that succeed, Democrat state Rep. Edmond Jordan has HB 636 all cued up and ready to go to tax it, although applied not to the sellers but producers of the constituent parts.

Hopefully, these will go nowhere but for another hallucinogenic product it’s gone way beyond the camel poking its nose into the tent. After hemp production and sales legalization, lawmakers realized the way the law was written it could deliver products that deliver quite a buzz as well. Legislation passed last year tapped brakes onto the industry, forcing a toning down of potencies and restricting sales to fewer potential outlets and not to people under 21.

But the problem remained in that even if “servings” were quantified at a lower size and psychotropic level, with impunity adults can run out and buy as much as they want to bring about a high, although with more difficulty. Even though the state tax receipts from these items consist of only a few million bucks annually, the nascent industry’s lobbying arm has proven adept at keeping the enterprise legal (Louisiana’s level of regulation falls about in the middle of states; a few make it illegal while about half have it legal with little restriction, with the rest in between).

Thus, a couple of bills have been prefiled for the upcoming regular session that would jack up taxes on hemp-based sales as a disincentive for use. One, HB 235 by Republican state Rep. Mike Echols, would tack on an extra 17 percent excise tax with collected monies distributed to education, criminal justice, drug education, and hemp testing uses. The other, HB 187 by GOP state Rep. Bryan Fontenot, raises the existing three percent levy only 12 percent.

If legislators want to walk back hemp legalization while assuaging any guilt they might feel about allowing adults to walk into almost any kind of stores and grab enough products to buzz yet mouthing pieties about not hampering business but secretly looking for more revenue for general purposes, they might latch onto Fontenot’s bill. They also could approve a pair of bills by Republican state Rep. Laurie Schlegel that apply punitive measures to illegal sales.

But neither genie appears to be put back into the bottle, or at least realistically restricted in any way. Just not enough of the spirit of Daniel Schneider to go around the Capitol, it would seem.

TOPS bill must jettison lowest standards

More than just retain more higher education students in state, the Louisiana Legislature should expand on a bill to make the Taylor Opportunity Program for Students a true merit-based award.

TOPS guarantees that if a graduating high school senior in Louisiana achieves certain mediocre standards that the state will pay a substantial portion of higher education tuition. Until about a decade ago all tuition was covered, leaving only fees unsubsidized (although higher achievement above the lowest standards merited an additional stipend), but then the level was decoupled from tuition increases and a gap began to grow. For example, the present reimbursement of in-state non-accelerated program tuition at my institution leaves a gap of $283.68 or just over 5 percent for the annual 30 hours, not including $1,712.64 in other fees (this is for the basic Opportunity qualifier; higher ACT scores could push a qualifier into the Performance or Honors category where stipends of $400 or $800, respectively, are given).

The gaps, it is claimed, are part of the reason why a slow by sure decline in number of Louisiana graduates accepting TOPS awards. In response, Republican state Rep. Chris Turner has filed HB 77 that would increase the minimum award for each TOPS level that in many cases exceeds the highest tuition and fees now charged (there would be a few exceptions, such as those Louisiana State University makes to admit certain students that otherwise wouldn’t meet Board of Regents-defined standards, but many of the exceptions come in under other scholarship programs). It also would create a fourth category for the highest achievers, Excellence, with a larger bonus (keep in mind, however, that Honors winners wouldn’t even meet the admission standards at some flagship universities in other states, while Excellence winners would).

Make leftists pay for opposing fiscal reform

The irony is that at the precise time that Louisiana’s teachers have most demonstrated they deserve a pay raise they now are least likely to receive one, courtesy of the political left which in the past often backed that cause.

Leftists in the electorate did opposite of what they once preached when last month they voted down a constitutional amendment which would have made school districts grant the hike in perpetuity. Going against the wishes of teacher unions, leftist special interests managed to turn out enough electoral support to do this, although some distracted conservatives who lost sight of the forest for the trees aided them.

This happened even though more than ever teachers deserved a reward for the progress their students have made. In the past few years, Louisiana schools have sprinted up state educational rankings, which surely can be credited to improved teaching thus meriting higher future pay.

BC Council to navigate Bossier way challenges

At its next meeting, the Bossier City Council will begin facing the consequences of getting along and going along with the old Bossier way, but will have a chance as well to begin its repudiation, focused upon happenings in newly-reelected Republican Vince Maggio’s district.

City elections occurred as news broke about a questionable deal the city made with two property owners in Maggio’s district. At the Council meeting days before the election, Republican Councilor Brian Hammons queried as to why the city was giving each a new parking lot.

As this space previously had noted, the answer City Attorney Charles Jacobs gave, that supposedly the owners had threatened lawsuits over alleged damage from construction of the nearby Walter O. Bigby Carriageway, when investigated lacked credibility. Instead, available evidence suggested that public dollars were being spent to aid the private business of a friend since childhood of GOP Councilor David Montgomery, a conclusion also forwarded in a post at the news and entertainment web site SOBO.live. That media outlet put in a public records request to obtain exact documentation of the incident.

Low stimulus crucial to LA amendments' defeat

It’s time to settle the debate that has arisen about results concerning recent statewide constitutional amendments that failed, and we begin by reviewing a major contributing factor to their defeat by nearly 2:1.

On paper, the most persuasive interpretation would be the results mainly are an artifact of structural turnout patterns. For decades, as the major political parties have become increasingly ideologically pure and polarized, the effect first observed half a century ago of the top-bottom nature of Democrats – support shaped like a barbell wider at the top of the socioeconomic scale, thinner in the middle, and again expanded at the bottom – and the toy top nature of Republican support – thinner at the top and bottom of SES, thick in the middle – has given way to a more defined inversion of the class system insofar as political parties go.

Increasingly, this reordering where now support for Democrats resembles more an inverted pyramid and Republican identifiers shape into a standard wine bottle has implications for election turnout. In the middle of the 20^th century observers believed higher-turnout elections favored Democrats, since less-reliable voters disproportionately had lower SES characteristics who in turn disproportionately voted for Democrats, but as the inversion began to accelerate (because of the emergence of the affluent society after World War II that brought a different issue mix in elections to the fore) that tendency disappeared.

Cast critical eye on opposing less govt spending

Already the narrative is being pounded home by leftist-sympathetic traditional media that suppressing federal government spending will prove as cataclysmic to America as Ramses’ stubbornness did to Mosaic Egypt. Don’t buy it, as illustrated in a case in Louisiana.

Recently, the Acadiana Advocate delivered a story about the impact of reduced federal spending on farm subsidies. In particular, it lamented projected cuts to U.S. Department of Agriculture programs that help food banks and schools purchase food from small local farmers.

It agonized a bit over the lost income this market distortion would cause farmers, but the main problem it conveyed was the distribution of free or subsidized food would be attenuated. Individuals associated with food banks and similar organizations were reported wringing their hands over the possibility of increased “food insecurity,” which allegedly a seventh of Louisianans suffered.

Election reformist tide swamps BC insiders

The clean sweep starting in 2021 of Bossier City elected majoritarian branch officials that was completed last week also resulted in a near clean sweep of Bossier political insiders in favor of reformers, the latest city elections produced.

Exactly four years ago the city was being run by a mayor with 16 years in office and a set of city councilors who had among them 127 years of service. Come Jul. 1, it will have a mayor of 4 years in and combined service among councilors of just 12 years. None will have been in office more than four years.

Moreover, this rolling revolution will put a majority of reformers outside of the current political establishment in charge of the Council, a first in the city’s history. In their rookie terms, both Republicans Chris Smith and Brian Hammons left no doubt as to their reformist chops. They will be joined the GOP’s Cliff Smith, who through his activities as a concerned citizen left no doubt of that status.

Try again with fiscal reform minus bad timing

The constitutional amendment that rewrote the fiscal portion of Louisiana’s Constitution failed primarily because of a tactical error made by Republican Gov. Jeff Landry and his legislative allies.

This amendment, #2, sunk last weekend with only 35 percent of the vote on 21.3 percent turnout. The key to understanding why and how this translates into the blunder is in who was activated to vote against it.

Much was made of some conservative opposition to it, but the size of the loss is the first indication that this didn’t have much to do with the result. Picking up on a Trojan Horse meme circulated by the left designed to ensnare them, these individuals put their thinking caps aside and shunned the pro-growth, smaller government aspects of the reforms in favor of panicked long-shot interpretations that passage meant the state would tax churches out of existence. However, only had the result been a much closer loss would they have made the difference.

On election eve, Bossier way rears its ugly head

On the eve of city elections, controversy erupted at this week’s City Council meeting that displayed graphically the old Bossier political way, a mixture of electoral, transactional, and crony politics possibly involving corruption and certainly advertising for change from it via the upcoming electoral exercise.

Perhaps any or all of Republican Mayor Tommy Chandler, City Atty. Charles Jacobs, Asst. City Atty. Richard Ray (if watching the proceedings from afar), and nominal City Engineer Ben Rauschenbach had a sinking feeling when, during the meeting after GOP Councilor Brian Hammons had brought Rauschenbach to the podium for questioning about an agenda item, Hammons said he had an unrelated matter on which to query him. Hammons, whose day job is in building, then described a scenario where business owners were asking him about, and even petitioning for, the city reconstructing parking lots for private businesses – a matter they claimed the city had performed and one that never came before the Council for approval. He asked Rauschenbach what he knew of it.

The Waggoner Engineering employee, who by virtue of the firm’s contract with the city serves as its engineering chief, usually has information about projects and their costs at his fingertips. But this time he said he would defer to Jacobs or Ray to explain. Jacobs was present, and what ensued should be presented verbatim:

Landry finally defeats "baantjies vir boeties"

Last week, Republican Gov. Jeff Landry completed the inevitable defeat of baantjies vir boeties, making a bad but unfortunately necessary policy less obnoxious while telling special interests and courthouse gangs to go pound sand.

Baantjies vir boeties – “jobs for the boys” – was an expression heard in the old Republic of South Africa during the reign of the National Party up until majority rule came about in 1994. The instituters of apartheid pursued this strategy to keep white support from erosion by moderate-to-radical competitors focusing on economic class concerns that could distract from its racial politics message, doing so through heavy government regulation and spending to provide employment in both the public and private sectors. (Many other polities had ruling regimes that promised the same, but the old RSA example was the starkest in its brazenness.)

The same tactic, in the same sense that it was to use government power to reward supporters with jobs and other concessions, Democrat former Gov. John Bel Edwards foisted upon Louisiana when he stipulated changes to the Industrial Tax Exemption Program. This procedure had allowed a new concern a partial-to-total break from property taxes for up to a decade. The state’s Board of Commerce and Industry – mostly gubernatorial appointees and the rest being elected or appointed officials including a designee of the governor – rules on these with the governor having a veto power. Thus, a governor basically can dictate the parameters by which breaks are given.

Obtuse LA public defense board unnecessary

If this slovenliness is what we get from Louisiana’s Public Defender Oversight Board, policy-makers might as well chuck the whole thing.

Earlier this year, State Public Defender Remy Starns declared he wouldn’t renew the contracts of five of the state’s 35 district defenders. Perhaps not coincidentally, the five argued against a pay plan Starns had brought to the board last year that ultimately in the main was not accepted, which would have cut their salaries.

As a result of legislation last year, the Board underwent a name and function change. The changes took it away from an active management role and more towards the word added to its appellation, “oversight.” It did retain the power to oversee finances to the point to have power over financing decisions as under existing contracts.

Bill provides redress for subsidized bad policy

A bill the Louisiana Legislature will consider during this spring’s regular session would redress bad federal government policy that diverts use of lands within the state to low priority purposes.

HB 4 by Republican state Rep. Chuck Owen would allow individual parishes to have a final say over carbon capture sequestration within their boundaries, subject to a popular veto. The governing authority may disapprove of a sequestration siting, but if it approves a referendum may be called by 15 percent of registered voters to hold a vote disapproving. Either way, local interests will determine whether such projects get built.

That’s as it should be, because of the bias built into the tax code that is the only thing, other than ideologically-based faith, that prompts any building of these facilities placed underground to store carbon produced in industrial or consumer surroundings. Understanding the interlocked nature of the process explains where Louisiana is and why the law is beneficial.

Monroe council budget alterations unwise

A Monroe City Council majority seems determined to launch a risky pay raise plan and apportion more funds to a special district with a checkered recent history, contrary to independent Mayor Friday Ellis’ fiscal year 2026 budget.

In a special meeting, the Council proposed a number of changes to the Ellis plan. Most were incremental in nature in keeping with the roughly $72 million ceiling, but a couple stood out as significant.

One shoveled $323,000 more into salary increases for city employees. The Council majority of Democrats Rodney McFarland, Verbon Muhammad, and Juanita Woods previously had expressed a desire to attempt some kind of permanent pay hike.

Prudent to overkill marks BC incumbent spending

In Bossier City Council elections, one incumbent seeks balance in utilizing campaign resources while another relies on his decades in office rather than dollars, yet the remaining other tries to shatter all spending records (which are his), reflecting both political realities and candidate personalities.

Of these three incumbents, Republican Councilor Chris Smith has conducted the kind of campaign most typically seen, according to campaign finance reports filed through Mar. 9 activity. He has spent – as an at-large candidate, the total amounts usually would be somewhat higher than for running in a district – with emphasis on eye-level media and digital contacting.

Actually, relative to the size of his constituency, his campaign hasn’t spent all that much, just over $10,000 in 2025, leaving him with over $20,000. His fundraising is an eclectic mixture of city political insiders, such as City Attorney Charles Jacobs (who opposed him in a lawsuit over the Council’s refusal to follow the city charter that Smith joined to see that the Charter was followed), large contractors of the city such as Waggoner Engineering and Live Oak Environmental Services, and reformers.

LA Democrats facing long-term minority status

Louisiana Democrats will find themselves in an even deeper hole if national trends rippling down to the state and parish level continue apace.

Late last year, the U.S. Census Bureau released state population estimates. Earlier this month, it released county population estimates. For Louisiana, in an absolute sense it was mixed bag, but in a relative sense overall positive.

The state gained population to have the most since 2021, at a slower rate than most other states, but the first half-year of Republican Gov. Jeff Landry’s tenure certainly improved over the eight years of Democrat Gov. John Bel Edwards when the state lost over 100,00 folks, tempered by the fact that there was a net loss of U.S. citizens but that was offset by more non-citizens in residence, whether legally.

Now started, LA should clear quickly death row

Louisiana leaders must recognize the struggle they have invited with anti-capital punishment ideologues that wish to cancel democratically-made policy, and how to win it.

For many years, politics prevented the state from carrying out executions, by political pressure zealots put on suppliers of chemicals used for the lethal injection method, the only method allowed in recent decades until last year, and the presence of Democrat Gov. John Bel Edwards, who for political reasons refused to admit he was one of those zealots until late in his second term and would stand in the way of legal changes to add (in the case of electrocution, add back) methods to executions.

But the elections of 2023 and principally Republican Gov. Jeff Landry capturing the office broke the logjam, and last year electrocution and nitrogen hypoxia became legal methods. After a few months to set up an entirely constitutional protocol – reaffirmed days ago – regarding hypoxia, the state announced it was back in the justice business and started to queue up executions, beginning with Jesse Hoffman who has been sitting on death row for 27 years.

Resoluteness on executions needed to save lives

Perhaps by the time you read this Louisiana will have seen through its first implementation of capital punishment in 15 years. As opposition to it finds expression through those ideologically opposed to it, through sympathetic media, as well as those caught up oversimplifying the issue, keep in mind that this opposition may not care about whether justice is served or whether it behaves ethically, as to them any means justifies the ends of stopping executions.

Waiting in death’s wings is Jesse Hoffman, Jr., whose gruesome kidnapping, rape and murder of Mary “Molly” Elliott earned him a capital sentence nearly three decades ago. He has remained on death row for so long because Louisiana law didn’t permit executions other than through lethal injection, and ideological activists had scared of companies from making available the chemicals to accomplish this, until the state added nitrogen hypoxia as a method.

The usual suspects have tried to stop or delay his Mar. 18 fate with the mask. Likely a number of them are principled opponents who don’t know or for whatever psychic reason ignore that having capital punishment, with carefully investigated cases of those who with extreme malice aforethought killed somebody, consistently applied saves lives. The problem is, they may not be driving the anti-execution train that puts justice aside to promote personal or ideological reasons.

Monroe should seek efficiencies, not tax hikes

Maybe Monroe policy-makers should think outside the box if they want to reduce the city’s operation on a fiscal knife-edge and provide pay raises for city employees without hitting up taxpayers for more dough.

At the last City Council meeting, which appended a budget hearing onto it, some councilors expressed a desire to see annual salary increases, perhaps at the 2.5 percent level, for city employees. Some also wanted more money for recreation facilities. The problem is there’s no money for any of this.

The proposed fiscal year 2026 budget showed overall about a $2 million or three percent revenue boost in the general fund that pays for most city operating activities. Raises for those functions at the desired level would gobble up more than half of that increase, as salaries, wages, and benefits comprised 69 percent of the FY 2025 budget spending. Indeed, 70 percent of that increase was going to public safety which consumes 40 percent of city spending, meaning this function would bear the brunt of any redirection of revenues at current levels.

Panic must not lead to opposing good amendment

Ludwig von Mises coined the term “useful innocents” – later transformed by others into a less -charitable term “useful idiots” – to describe those who he saw as “confused and misguided sympathizers” of communism. While that ideology isn’t in play over Amendment 2 to Louisiana’s Constitution appearing on the Mar. 29 ballot, certainly the term applies as the political left has found allies on the right to help it do it dirty work in trying to vote down the measure that would transform fundamentally for the better the state’s fiscal system.

The left has pursued a two-prong strategy to this end. One involves an attack over procedural measures surrounding the amendment’s placing on the ballot (as well as with two others). Upon inspection, its attempt is quite wanting and the judiciary unlikely will find merit in it, but as a by-product of the suit to invalidate the ballot placement as a result the ensuing publicity is designed to sow doubt in the minds of those who, upon analysis of its claims, should know better.

The other is a campaign to convince normally sober supporters of religious activity of a fantastic plot to strip from the property of religious organizations not exclusively used for religious purposes ad valorem tax exemptions, merely by the move through Amendment 2 of such exemptions from the Constitution into statute. The change is part of strategy of removing from the document things that are absolutely not necessarily part of a bedrock assessment of guiding principles behind it – in this case, that imperative being that religious activity should be supported by the state in prohibiting local governments (and, technically, the state as the Constitution empowers it to levy a statewide property tax of up to 5.75 mills, but it never has done so) from taxing property unequivocally part of a religious mission – into statute, if only to reduce the outsized and overly-specific nature of the document as it stands.

Five years on, LA learned hard pandemic lessons

And so it started five years ago today, unwise actions by Democrat former Gov. John Bel Edwards that, as a saving grace at least, established – at a high and unnecessary cost – a knowledge bank from which to work in the future and triggered some beneficial changes to state policies.

The Wuhan coronavirus pandemic had launched in all ways but name, becoming noticeable in several of the largest cities in the country but also in New Orleans. Credit Carnival, which had ended almost three weeks earlier, as the device that brought it hot and heavily into the state. So, on Mar. 13, 2020, Edwards issued the first of a string of proclamations under his statutory powers – then heavily favoring unilateral gubernatorial action – significantly curtailing personal and economic freedoms of individuals.

Perhaps he could be forgiven in the early, uncertain days of the pandemic for such a reaction, and the prevailing ethos was that stopping most everything for a couple of weeks would knock the virus down in its tracks. But the problem became a mutation of that ethos into creating close to attaining a zero-risk “zero Covid” environment requiring the heavy hand of the state that, even that early on, preceptive policy-makers realized was impossible and that the costs would be staggeringly high even to achieve mild and incomplete effectiveness towards that goal.

Speed camera rules in LA still need tightening

An action that increasingly has become mistaken the Shreveport City Council, with Republican Mayor Tom Arceneaux’s blessing, seems set to expand, knocking on to Caddo Parish’s foray into it – begging further legislative intervention.

A few years ago, the city installed traffic control cameras around school zones where speed limits would change. The rationale given was safety, but that always is the last refuge of scoundrels when dealing with these instruments around speed limit changes and lighted intersections. Rather than setting up a whole camera infrastructure, sworn law enforcement officers can hold monitors and save a government thousands or even millions of dollars in forgone equipment, maintenance, and operating fees.

Instead, despite their bleating otherwise, it’s all about money. That’s why Shreveport has put up with plenty of controversy about defective operations and phantom offenses to continue the initiative – some two to three million bucks a year in revenue over expenses through last year. So much so now Caddo Parish will join in as the city looks to place more cameras on roads the contractor Blue Line Solutions reaping business from the city to operate the cameras claims have a high propensity for speeding on them.

Left whips up fear in attempt to scuttle revamp

Attempts to derail Amendment 2 on Louisiana’s March 29 ballot come in two types: as previously mentioned a disingenuous legal strategy, but also a more principled opposition yet which fails on the merits – where the former tries to scare the latter into agreement.

One dubious approach tries to have the entire measure thrown off the ballot for alleged infractions. Soon to be put to the test in court, those behind it as well as supporters of the effort inhabit the political left which wants to see the measure fail by any means possible as it offends their ideological sensibilities; i.e. it makes expansive government for redistributive purposes more difficult by, in the main, granting income tax relief to middle-class filers and above and makes it easier to cut out favoritism in the tax code.

However, another more thoughtful tack against focuses on the amendment’s paring of tax exceptions in the Constitution. The thinking is not only would this make for a less-unwieldy document but also create greater flexibility to change out of items that may have protection today which in the future may be determined to make less sense as exceptions and then can be altered or abandoned more easily.

Vote affirmative on consequential LA amendments

All four, including the most consequential in decades, amendments to the Louisiana Constitution on the Mar. 29 ballot deserve voter approval. Let’s see why.

#1 – would clarify disciplining of out-of-state lawyers and creation of multi-parish specialty courts. Essentially, a loophole exists that inhibits disciplining this cohort for some matters, which the change would close. Specialty courts, existing presently in areas such as drug cases, family matters, and for veterans, are confined to the 64 parishes or 42 judicial districts. Proponents say a regional approach could help in matters such as these and for potentially new kinds of courts, such as a business court seen in the majority of states. This would have the disadvantage of adding more elected judges in a state that seats a surplus of judges, but on the whole there are more plusses than minuses. YES.

#2 – would reduce the maximum rate of income tax, double income tax deductions for residents age 65 or older, slow down a governmental growth limit, merge significant constitutional funds while moving lesser ones into statute, give parishes more severance tax dollars, provide incentive to prevent state taxpayers from subsidizing local taxpayers, move some tax breaks into statute, and prompt a salary increase for teachers while paring unfunded mandates, among other items. Lengthy and complex, it serves as the linchpin to fiscal reforms enacted by the Legislature last year.

Bin unserious proposed NIL tax break bill

A bill contemplated by Republican state Rep. Dixon McMakin makes no fiscal sense and only subverts the purpose of higher education in Louisiana.

The bill in concept would exempt from state income tax earnings that college students receive from Name, Image, and Likeness deals in athletics. Individuals may negotiate these or another organization, such as a school, may do so on behalf of all its eligible students.

Dollar figures for these are generally not public, and they can be substantial. Publicized have been deals by Louisiana State University gymnast Livvy Dunne who, despite modest athletic credentials, has one of the most lucrative set of NIL deals due to her superior marketing skills, estimated in the neighborhood of at least $4 million annually. Regardless, given the state’s income tax rates, such an exemption may not even cost the state eight figures annually.

GOP Medicaid reform to benefit LA disabled

Rather than trepidation, the most health-vulnerable Louisianans should feel elation that the Republican Congress is talking about changing Medicaid reimbursement rules for states.

As part of federal government right-sizing discussions, the House of Representatives GOP majority has set as a goal a reduction of $880 billion over the next decades in costs that include Medicaid. Even factoring out non-Medicaid expenditures and well as waste reduction – and anybody who has worked through the Medicaid-financed system knows there is a formidable amount of it – the total dollar amount the federal government would have to spend on Medicaid would have to decrease to meet this goal.

In tandem, the majority has discussed making Medicaid subject to block grants. This would give states greater latitude over how funds designated for Medicaid could be spent in fulfilling its purposes, allowing them to better target highly-needy individuals rather than disproportionate spending on those less so or in no real need.

Bill could help discourage scofflaw landlords

Insofar as the upcoming 2025 regular session of the Louisiana Legislature and dealing with scofflaw apartment complex owners (and somewhat stealing from the “Mad Max” franchise), two bills enter, one bill leaves.

An issue that primarily has popped up in Shreveport involves apartment complex owners not paying water bills to the city and no real means to force them to do so. This leaves the city with the Hobson’s choice of tolerating it or cutting it off that then puts residents in a bind. Residents supposedly have an approximation of their water bills rolled into rent, as the complexes have a single line paid wholly which then splits off into individual units. But even though most occupants pay their rent, owners at several complexes haven’t remitted their due to the city for months.

The city has trouble collecting as ownership arrangements under law don’t present a responsible entity from which the city readily can collect. The complexes in question are older, lower-income residential in nature where the owners, because the properties aren’t worth much, bleed them as much as they can. Also some such properties the city has had declared derelict, with others otherwise habitable it has tolerated leaving water on a few hours a day so as not to make the situation of the residents paying in good faith untenable.

Just say no, in triplicate, to BC amendments

The best reason for Bossier Citians to vote down all three charter amendments on Mar. 29 is not so much what they do but what they don’t do.

Two of the three introduce relaxed term limit proposals, that only would permit three consecutive terms for city councilors and the mayor but leave open the chance that an elected official could return to a previous office after at least one term out. Products of a Charter Review Commission whose final membership was comprised of appointees of city councilors hostile to term limits and their appointees, in isolation these offerings are unobjectionable, but they don’t exist in isolation.

Because on May 3, another, more stringent, term limits amendment hits the ballot. This one is three terms lifetime and retroactive, product of a citizen-led petition process and the superior version if the goal is to prevent citizen-politicians from being captured by government.

Monroe school district unable to get it together

As if City of Monroe Schools didn’t have enough problems, apparent thievery at the top is being complemented it would seem from the bottom as well, all the while with the district saddled with minimal, even deteriorating, academic progress.

In the past year, the District has been rocked by allegations that former Superintendent Brent Vidrine on two occasions defrauded it. As part of his contract, he was allowed to buy more service time for retirement, but allegedly he forged documents to show he paid more than he did to receive the benefit. He has been indicted for this, but has paid back some, $20,000, and retired from the District last year even as he seemed to have shorted the district over $48,000 more. Still unresolved is annual extra but unauthorized payments according to his contracts totaling over $141,000 during his decade-long employment.

Possibly this activity was so under the radar that the Monroe City School Board couldn’t discover it during normal due diligence. In last year’s audit, the Board promised closer attention to superintendent reimbursement as a response. But how it has handled reports of spending concerning student activity accounts doesn’t exactly inspire confidence that the current Board can get it right.

Wise to remove diversity from LA teacher grants

In the final analysis, Republican Pres. Donald Trump’s decision to end educational grants that give a role to intentional diversification of the teaching profession can provide Louisiana with the chance to improve its training of future teachers.

Expressions of concern, if not outright apoplexy, ensued when the Trump Administration notified it would end hundreds of millions of dollars of grants that had components designed to give preference to racial minorities in teacher training. In Louisiana, under the Teacher Quality Partnerships Program it would appear three grantees with about $13 million in remaining budget authority were affected, and under Supporting Effective Educator Development grants it would appear one grant with $3 million in budget authority remaining was affected. All explicitly set as a goal preference to serving minority applicants in order to create a more racially diverse teacher workforce.

Complaints came from those involved in the grants as well as special interests who benefited from them, decrying the move as damaging to teacher recruitment generally but in particular towards creating a more racially diverse educator workforce. Yet the facts show such hand-wringing as misplaced.

BC blowing fuse over unneeded car chargers

So, what part of “waste of money” do Republican Bossier City Mayor Tommy Chandler and the City Council not understand?

City taxpayers may be excused for thinking the city wasn’t going to pursue a project it actually first contemplated in 2018, and got the official award for in 2021 – two fast charging electric vehicle outlets. This comes from a court settlement where Volkswagen promised to pay up for surreptitiously selling vehicles able to dodge emissions standards. The consent decree allows states and Indian tribes and Puerto Rico and the District of Columbia to solicit money from a trust fund for projects that reduce nitrogen oxides emitted from vehicles.

Each state came up with plans detailing eligible usages. A common usage in Louisiana’s has been conversion of older school buses from diesel to something else. In fact, among several local education agencies the Bossier Parish School District won just such an award in 2020 to replace 25 such 2009-or-older buses with new ones powered by propane with the grant picking up half the tab. This meant the BPSD could purchase newer replacements at less than market rate, a potential savings in the million-dollar range. The district did have to fund to install a propane filling unit at its bus barn and it’s unknown whether the fuel and maintenance costs of these buses are higher or lower than for the remainder of the diesel-run fleet.

Right-sizing LA govt means less local govt aid

Part of Republican Gov. Jeff Landry’s fiscal reform attempts to right-size Louisiana government must include assigning spending to its appropriate level of subsidiarity, a recent controversy reveals.

Last week, when Landry had introduced the fiscal year 2026 budget, concern arose over removal of a $7 million appropriation to distribute grants to domestic violence shelters. Befitting current revenue estimates, Landry wanted to produce a budget essentially at standstill, which meant forgoing almost all temporary items from last year.

This included that line item, tucked away in the FY 2025 supplemental appropriation bill and replicating from the previous year. Direct state appropriations happen only sporadically, with the last prior to FY 2024-25 being in 2018. Note that a dedicated funding source exists – self-generated revenues from one half of the fee charged for marriage licenses, and from civil fees charged to persons filing any suit or proceeding for divorce, annulment of marriage, or establishment or disavowal of the paternity of children – but this generates less than half a million bucks a year for general domestic violence mitigation.

BC has chance to cure herpetic outlay request

A Bossier City Council on the verge of its biggest shakeup in nearly a quarter-century may tell at its next meeting, after a promising sign at its previous gathering, whether it finally has renounced its free-spending, money-wasting ways.

This week, the Council will consider its annual five-year Capital Outlay Budget. While the plan may be altered at any time, it gives an idea of city priorities for infrastructure over the next half-decade.

As an example of how the city may pivot, earlier this month it considered plunking down front money, plus a small amount for contingencies, of $80,000 to install two electric vehicle charging stations on the top deck of the Louisiana Boardwalk parking garage it built two decades ago as a gift to developers. This stemmed from the federal government’s Volkswagen Environmental Mitigation Trust Fund program that would pay for purchase and installation of light duty direct current fast charging (“level 3” or about 20 to 60 minutes for a full charge) chargers according to a state plan, which in Louisiana means along various corridors located within a close distance of a high-speed roadway, or in Bossier City’s case Interstate 20. A survey of available power infrastructure led to this particular siting.

Landry must resist warping of standstill budget

As currently constituted, Republican Gov. Jeff Landry’s most pressing budget task will be to resist government-as-usual to continue right-sizing state government and to fund priorities that improve quality of life within Louisiana.

When introduced last week described as a “standstill” budget, spending rises less than one percent. However, that masks a lot of change, principally from two sources: the disappearance of pandemic-related grants and one-time spending attached to that but countered by continuation of escalating health care costs triggered by Medicaid expansion almost a decade ago. In all, while state means of finance fall two percent, a federal funds increase of around 3.5 percent more than offsets that to increase the total adjusted budget a few hundred million to $45 billion.

Lesser movement comes from shifting priorities. Not surprisingly, health care continues to vacuuming up more dollars, although there were a couple of novel situations. A decline in collections from motor vehicles and from state lands produced more demands on the general fund. On the spending side, juvenile justice and child welfare matters receive a boost, as does general public safety. And, contrary to claims made by advocates of committing to increasing food aid in the summer with federal dollars that this wouldn’t cost the state, the budget had to include extra state dollars to cover that.

Removing Lewis for bad judgment appropriate

And this is why the political left is out of power in Washington and can’t win an election in most parts of Louisiana – intellectual poverty behind its argumentation seen as such by enough voters who demand better.

At its last meeting, the Louisiana Public Service Commission stripped Democrat Davante Lewis of his vice chairmanship for remarks made over social media. The job, which Lewis had assumed only at the year’s beginning, carries little weight and basically gives its holder the power to run meetings in the absence of the chairman.

Lewis precociously had been put into the job after just two years as a commissioner at the request of the year’s chairman, Republican Mike Francis, out of a spirit of bipartisanship he said. Francis then moved to remove Lewis upon learning of the remarks, and following partisan lines by a 3-2 vote Lewis was dumped.