As policy ideas about Baton Rouge continue to circulate that would
reduce the amount of money coming into Louisiana’s two dominant retirement
funds by assets, each tries to crow about its performance when anything beyond
surface analysis reveals their warts. First it was the Louisiana State Employees Retirement System
which tried to mask
its subpar performance over the past decade and more; now it’s the Teachers Retirement System of Louisiana.
TRSL sent out a news
release with the latest results from a research firm comparing its
performance to other state pension funds, and to a smaller subgroup of those
with similar asset amounts. Over the five-year period ending in 2011, TRSL
returned 10.7 percent and 2.6 percent in private equity and real assets,
respectively. The U.S. average was 7.4 percent for private equity and 1.8
percent for real assets. The release did not give such statistics for the peer
group; unfortunately, the report is not publicly available, so TRSL’s place
among its peers cannot be determined, but it seems that positive news in that
category would have been reported in the release.
But, as with an analysis of LASERS, this kind of relative comparison means
little without looking at absolute performance metrics. One of these is to
compare the return on investments of the fund. At the end of fiscal year 2011, it
held about 60 percent in equities, about 15 percent in bonds, and the remainder
in “alternative investments,” which appear to be real estate and commodities
among other things. Reviewing return for the past five years reported (that is,
performance for FY 2007 through 2011), which includes more than just the
categories cited in the release, the average annual return for it was 3.074
percent, compared to the Standard and Poor’s 500 Index (which is based on
equities) return of a 4.143 percent. In other words, the fund would have done
better by plowing everything into an index fund representing the S&P 500.