Some federal government relief on the issue of Medicaid, as well as some overdue diligence in the program, could help Louisiana to address tightening budget conditions.
Last week the state’s Revenue Estimating Conference essentially reaffirmed projections for the next few fiscal years. With tax cuts coming unless the Legislature lengthens the duration of the sales taxes to roll off, revenues are projected essentially to remain flat for fiscal years 2028-30. That means unless the Legislature reduces spending and/or consents to use of the Budget Stabilization Fund at least in FY27, the general fund budget may go into deficit given the impact of price inflation.
Use of the BSF may not be all that bad, as it sits at a near-record amount, but legislators can’t use it two years running. Happily, final budget production last year by the federal government invites reductions in Medicaid spending, and as does better diligence by states.
As previously noted, reforms encapsulated in that budget process will give the states strong incentive to cut back on this spending by the federal government limiting extra payments to states to encourage reimbursement rates for Medicaid to be only at the same level as for Medicare. They also create disincentives to levy taxes on providers that are used as a device to grab more federal dollars, which if applied to Louisiana would make the presumed deficit a bit worse independently of the fewer dollars spent on Medicaid because of lower rates.
But the state has to help itself, and over the past several years Louisiana has offended among the worst in refusing to do this, at least up until 2024. Research shows that since 2019, under the most plausible take-up rate (the proportion of Medicaid expansion-eligible clients who do enroll in it), the state has one of the highest rates of ineligible recipients, a shocking 62 percent, with in that period the stunning highest per capita upwards change (nearly doubling) of all the states, in that final term of Democrat former Gov. John Bel Edwards who practically begged anybody and everybody to sign up except the obviously wealthy.
Worse, this includes even the first year of unwinding after the artificial inflation of roles during the pandemic period. Not all of this comprised people flat-out ineligible for Medicaid; many eligible under regular Medicaid likely were misclassified as expansion-eligible, and given the perverse incentive that the expansion population receives a 90 percent federal match while those with lower incomes and sicker receive get matched about 25 percent lower in Louisiana, states pay less by carelessness in categorizing recipients.
In part, that explains why Louisiana in 2024 paid out only an estimated $90 million extra. But if all of the ineligibles were otherwise qualified in no way – and remember the winding-down already largely had been accomplished by the end of that period who were all ineligible under regular standards – it would have been closer to $250 million. It’s not difficult for that figure to be zero – several states managed that, and neighboring Oklahoma had a misclassification rate of only one percent.