Louisiana’s intersection increasingly at the cutting
edge of policy-making refreshingly continues with its pursuit of a suit designed
to show deliberately designed unfettered access to chemical abortions can be
dangerous to more than just the unborn and to reinstate rules to prevent that
outcome.
The use of mifepristone as the second agent to
kill in the womb (following misoprostol) the state has led the way in trying to
have through the courts reimposed a Food and Drug Administration ban against doling
out the drugs except during a doctor’s office visit. The Democrat Pres. Joe
Biden Administration embraced the dictates of leftist abortion-on-demand advocates
to remove that requirement in the wake of the Supreme Court decision that ruled
unconstitutional federal government attempts to regulate abortion.
That move became a key element in the left’s strategy
to prevent individual tighter state regulation from reducing abortion. The left
celebrates the practice not only because of its assertive ideological-confirming
performance that also counts coup over
conservatives who largely favor pro-life restrictions, but also because of its
background unspoken
eugenics-based racism that doesn’t mind in a country that even as whites
comprise almost 70 percent of the population that almost 70 percent of
abortions are achieved by non-whites.
The campaign to dilute the ability of states to limit
severely abortion availability within their borders has succeeded to the point
that the number
of abortions nationwide actually has increased since that 2022 decision despite
many states imposed greater restrictions shortly thereafter. Remote prescribing
largely is blame with a sharp increase in that, now making the deadly pills
easily obtainable through the mail in almost an over-the-counter fashion with
no guarantee that the requestor is the receiver of these, or even is
legitimately asking.
Precisely as intended. The system was concocted specifically
to thwart state bans and making the dispensing as easy as buying candy. And why,
if the Republican Pres. Donald Trump
Administration as it may do soon doesn’t return to rule to its previous form,
the courts should because mifepristone, as Louisiana argues, reveals itself as
an inherently dangerous drug.
Leftist media always evade the growing
evidence of this, where women are being tricked, if not coerced through the
use of violence, into swallowing the dangerous substance that often causes them
health complications and usually killing the unborn they harbor. Almost always
it’s the sperm donor who perpetrates these crimes, and frequently they obtain
the pills through exploiting the now hardly-regulated system set up to fail.
A reality against which pro-abortion views have no
defense. After all, pro-abortionists admit humanity to an organism genetically
human only when it’s “wanted,” making the validity of human life and the individual
involved contingent on somebody else’s emotions. Yet in these abuse cases the
women involved look forward to giving birth but pro-abortion attitudes by
permitting lack of restrictions in essence put these females in positions where
they have no choice, which ironically the pro-abortion crowd alleges, to shield
themselves from the moral implications of what they advocate, that “choice” lies
behind their advocacy.
Simply, by nature the drug is dangerous, but pro-abortionists
redefine that away when it’s used willingly to kill the unborn. But in the
current regulatory regime where anything goes, those who don’t want to kill the
young humans they carry cannot be protected adequately from others who wish
their unborn charges dead. Only by restoring the regime to its previous state
can that risk be minimized adequately.
That’s why it’s important that Louisiana continue its legal quest to
have restored, one way or the other, the old rules. Lives and women’s desires
depend upon that.
