As the year began, state Rep. Patrick Williams
was maneuvering to become a fusionist candidate between races and major parties
to position himself as the main opposition to forces behind Mayor Cedric Glover, whose
ally City Councilman Sam
Jenkins appeared poised to represent those forces. No white candidate then appeared
emergent to rally Republican votes against these black Democrats.
But then Jenkins made what turned
out to be a temporary suspension of his campaign, and elites connected to
Glover’s city hall appeared to coalesce around former Caddo Parish School
District Superintendent Ollie
Tyler. Meanwhile, as many Republicans remained sanguine about putting up a
candidate in the wake of the miserable
showing their favored candidate had four years previously, the independent
and political novice Victoria
Provenza stepped into the void.
Thus, the script
was supposed to go like this: Tyler would inherit from the late-entering
and neutered Jenkins the Glover cabal based among black Democrats, Provenza
would attract white and Republican votes, and Williams would try to create a
winning coalition from anti-Glover black Democrats and enough whites and
Republicans. And then nothing went according to script.
An analysis of the 105 Caddo
non-split precincts for the city by race and party registration shows why Tyler
won a dominant 43 percent of the vote and Provenza edged out Williams for the
runoff. For his fusionist coalition to succeed, Williams needed to come close
to matching Tyler in black vote and do better than her among the white and
Republican segments. He accomplished none of that: in the 21 precincts where at
least 94 percent of the registrants were black, Tyler doubled up on his number
with 60 percent of that vote, while among the five that were at least 94
percent white registration, she slightly better than doubled him up with 27
percent of that vote. For her part, Provenza got about 53 percent of the vote
in the near-all-white precincts, but only 1 percent in the near-all-black
precincts.
Analyzing proportion of the vote by
proportions of white and black registrants and of Democrats and Republican
registrants, the equations were the same for the Williams and Tyler votes: the
lower the proportion of whites and the higher the proportion of Republicans,
the higher the proportion of the vote each received – black and Democrat
proportions where being split almost solely by them, so these exhibited no
relationship with their vote proportions. These significant relationships are
expected when a fusionist coalition is being built – except that Tyler did a
better job of getting more such votes within and across the racial spectrum. In
the final analysis, she proved to be the genuine fusionist candidate, which may
have been telegraphed in the weeks leading up to the election by the patterns of donors to each campaign.
The analysis of Provenza’s vote
showed her proportion varied with all four variables significantly, where by
precinct that rose as did the proportions of whites and blacks and where the
proportions of Democrats and Republicans fell. Keeping in mind each of these
relationships is observed holding the other three factors constant, this means
she tended to get disproportionately those less attached to the major political
parties, including white Democrats who normally vote Republican, and from other
races. It appears many Republicans threw in their lots with Tyler or Williams,
especially the former.
Which signals that Tyler serves as
the prohibitive favorite in the December runoff. Already besting Provenza by 18
points in the general election, she is likely to go well over 60 percent by
winning almost every black vote and a noticeable chunk of the white vote.
Whether the latter will be higher than in the general election is uncertain –
chances are turnout won’t be too much lower given the heated U.S. Senate
contest at the top of the ballot, but Williams’ white and Republican support
might be too disillusioned to support his main rival in a runoff – but it
should be more than adequate to carry her to victory.
One truism did prevail in this
campaign: the candidate that did the best job of constructing a fusionist
grouping would win. Tyler looks likely to turn out to be that candidate.
1 comment:
Jeff, an excellent analysis! I was surprised to see Ollie Tyler's number of votes in Broadmoor's precincts. You are right on with Tyler getting 60% or more of the vote in the Dec. 6 run-off. Bet Victoria Provenza is already planning her return to Colorado.
Post a Comment