Jeffrey D. Sadow is an associate professor of political science at Louisiana State University Shreveport. If you're an elected official, political operative or anyone else upset at his views, don't go bothering LSUS or LSU System officials about that because these are his own views solely. This publishes five days weekly with the exception of 7 holidays. Also check out his Louisiana Legislature Log especially during legislative sessions (in "Louisiana Politics Blog Roll" below).
Search This Blog
26.1.17
Cain deludes self concerning audit allegations
It’s entirely conceivable that former Louisiana
State Penitentiary Warden Burl Cain thinks what he did was not wrong. If so,
that only goes to show the kind of entitlement bubble in which these people
live, blind to what folks without delusions see.
A recent report
issued by the Louisiana Legislative Auditor faulted Cain on several accounts in
the latter years of his tenure, where he retired abruptly early last year after
critical reports appeared in the media that prompted the audit. It alleges he
benefitted to the tune of about $20,000 in free materials and services, as well
as enjoying an unspecified amount of free labor.
To which, Cain
replied via talk
radio, was much ado about nothing, at least concerning he and his family
members. He said the supposed free labor – provided by Angola employees on his
house off premises – occurred if state employees he contracted to failed to
report they took time off from their state duties, absolving him of any responsibility.
He argued that any unauthorized purchases to furnish his on-premises abode remained
state property. And as far as family members employed by the Department of
Corrections utilizing living quarters at Angola even though the state offered
to or did subsidize their housing elsewhere, he claimed the space was vacant in
any event, so what was the difference in where they were on any given day if
the state committed to subsidizing them anyway?
Some of what he asserted the legal system would
have a hard time proving as criminal. Ultimately, if people testify they did
not feel coerced to work on his private residence but on the days they did then
failed to indicate they took off, that does fall on them – even if what they
say now differs from what they felt then, and Cain knew this to exploit his
position of power over them, despite his current protestations otherwise.
But much of his defense he equates with taking home
pencils from his employer. In his mind, so what that he broke purchasing rules
in furnishing his campus pad? He left the unauthorized pencils there when he no
longer was using them as a state employee, right? And his explanation about
relatives using state housing shows no understanding of the malfeasance to
taxpayers involved: if you argue that only they used the guest housing, then
why have taxpayers build and maintain it since they have their own elsewhere,
but if non-relatives used it as well, then letting relatives stay so often – an
average of 37 nights a year – may have crowded out others for which taxpayers
intended to have lodging available?
Even Cain made an admission last year that he had
skirted the law when he sent a money order months after his departure for $250,
ostensibly to cover “incidental and outstanding expenses” from his stint in
state service. The audit identified one such item that may have qualified in
his mind, treating at Angola iron gating for his private home, valued around
$1,100. The note with the belated remuneration requested contact if that amount
seemed inadequate – a hollow gesture at best, for how would the state know of
under-the-radar transactions upon which the audit shed light without actually
going through an audit?
This line of thinking reflects a nauseous
entitlement mentality, that he could grab some goodies because he saw as so
tremendously valuable his contribution to the state. To him, that justifies and
makes moral such behavior; after all, to him in the larger scheme of things, it’s
just about pencils.
However, to the rest of the world that understands
that with principles distinguishing right and wrong behavior of public servants
there are no contingencies, it’s clear he crossed the line. Relevant prosecutors
currently have the audit results under consideration for potential action, and
Cain’s former boss (and business partner and ongoing friend) Secretary Jimmy
LeBlanc has advocated that the state bring civil actions to recoup the funds in
dispute.
Of course, prosecutors try cases where they think
they can prevail, at least partially, so if no indictments come, as Cain predicts,
then perhaps they will have decided the odds not good enough to commit public
funds to secure conviction of a figure well-connected politically. If so,
LeBlanc should follow through to make taxpayers whole.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment