As qualifying for the fall Senate election for
Republican Sen. Bill
Cassidy’s seat looms, no Democrat of any significance has signaled intent
to challenge him. No major party likes to give a free pass to an incumbent from
the other in either gubernatorial or senatorial contests because you have to
keep giving your voters a reason to call themselves your voters. Making them
troop habitually to the polls by serving up candidates with at least a chance
of winning, however remote, keeps the ground fertile for future opportunities
to flip that office.
Thus
has circulated the idea that, to offer up somebody who could pull more than
a quarter of the vote, Democrat donors and activists led by Democrat Gov. John Bel Edwards have
pressured Perkins to challenge Cassidy. Not only could this provide a quality
candidate, given Perkins’ current status, but it also would provide a public
relations boost for state Democrats because, despite blacks having comprised
the majority of the party’s base for years, its leadership only once has given
serious backing from the start to a black candidate in a major statewide
contest – convicted former Rep. Bill Jefferson’s run for governor in 1999. Even
within the past three years, getting it to rally behind a black candidate for any
statewide office has
been like pulling teeth.
So, the party can distance itself from the notion it
supports black politicians only as cynical lip service to collect black votes
by its backing Perkins now. And, the move
also could serve the fading political ambitions of Edwards, whose only path
to continued relevance would entail a long shot bid to knock off Republican
Sen. John Kennedy
in 2022. Having Perkins, who needn’t stand again for mayor until that year,
take a free shot this year could remind (especially black) Democrats that they
need to hit the polls almost every year to vote that way for statewide offices.
It’s as good a plan as any to give Democrats any
shot at all to win any of the three significant offices elected statewide in
the near future. If only Perkins goes along with it.
For if Perkins wishes to keep his office in Government
Plaza, it’s probably better that he passes on the Senate. The last thing he
needs is more attention on his time in office.
Keep in mind that Perkins won in 2018 only because,
like Edwards in 2015, he could present himself as a tabula rasa onto
which he could write appealing-enough messages to draw a majority. Edwards proceeded
to govern against the state’s majority, but, drawing upon the state’s diminishing
populist political culture and a national economic renaissance with policies
the opposite of his cushioning Louisiana’s economic deterioration under his policies,
still managed to eke out reelection.
Perkins has problems of a different, more threatening,
sort. Out of the gate he committed a series
of policy, if not ethical, missteps that soured both city politicians and
citizens. More recent decisions, such as staking
city economic development on a bloated, uncertain project with high upfront
costs and making
the city a participant in a welfare entitlement scheme drive away more than
attract future voters.
This makes him vulnerable to challenge not so much
from the right, but the left, principally in the form of Shreveport Democrat Councilor
LeVette Fuller,
who has positioned herself (interestingly, given
her progressive background) as a good government advocate opposing Perkins’
controversial moves. She also recently
has gotten out in front of efforts to investigate Shreveport
police actions against a mentally disturbed man who died in custody.
The blemish on her trajectory became visible again
last week when a court
erased her drunk driving conviction from last year, after she successfully
completed her sentence. The incident where she was found fairly incoherently in
her car near her residence in many instances could keep the lid on a political
career for a considerable time, if not forever.
Except that in this instance, Perkins may be way,
way vulnerable. Scuttlebutt
around Shreveport has been that Perkins has been stopped for drunk driving four
times since April, with the last occasion allegedly earlier in July.
Supposedly, his administration and cooperative police officials have prevented
any leakage of official documents and/or testimony to corroborate. This has led
to speculation that, if Perkins engages in such behavior, it stems from mental
health issues explicated in his military service records that he never has
released publicly.
None of this is proven to have happened. But if
any of it were true, you can bet it would come out if he ran for the Senate,
and it would doom any chance he has for reelection, much less defeat Cassidy. That
argues for Perkins passing on the plan, which then would intensify the gossip,
but, if any of it is true, would represent his best chance to ride out the
speculation to win reelection.
No comments:
Post a Comment