First in
print, then over
the air, Tarver tried to dispute conjecture that he staged a public break
with Perkins, who as
of May was dating his daughter (although apparently in long-distance fashion
as Perkins recently graduated from Harvard Law School), while supporting him behind
the scenes. For months some observers had linked the two together, and questioned
the genuineness of a summer statement by Tarver announcing his withdrawal of
support.
Tarver cited two reasons for his rejection: that
Perkins, a Caddo Parish registrant since 2007 (just after he reached the age of
voting eligibility), never had voted, and that he actually didn’t really reside
in the parish and lied to Tarver about that. Before entering school, where one
can live outside a parish but still be considered a resident while attending a
higher education institution, Perkins’ military career had him stationed in
Georgia, where he has owned a house for several years. However, since 2016 he
has had registration at his mother’s house in Shreveport.
For Tarver, his complaints come about Perkins’ credibility. He calls Perkins’ deceptive over his residency and disingenuous over his commitment to Shreveport by his failure to vote ever. But these specific grievances lead to larger questions that could circulate among the public.
Essentially, Tarver’s shining the spotlight on
these matters invites the electorate to question whether it would want someone
in office who, until months ago, seemed indifferent to the community. It highlights
that Perkins hardly has lived there and appeared so detached from the issues
surrounding it that he couldn’t be bothered to request and fill out an absentee
ballot even once in over a decade.
That information also detracts from Perkins’ outsider
image, as someone who travelled around and served his country ready to return home
and bring a fresh perspective to governance. Such candidates have come more into
vogue in the past few years, but at least they typically have involved
themselves in community affairs to some degree. In effect, Tarver’s charges
make Perkins more of an international man of mystery, mutating the image of Perkins
as an everyman free of past political connections who can appeal across multiple
constituencies into one of an empty vessel with an unknown agenda potentially
willing to shill for whatever interests back him.
(As to those interests, Perkins’ campaign
finance filing doesn’t give away much. Besides the fact a number of
donations don’t come with the legally-required address and a number come from
the east coast, some local old-line white Democrats gave, most prominently the
campaign committee of former Mayor Keith Hightower.)
This kind of profile typically doesn’t endear
itself to voters. So, it’s very hard to argue that some kind of Tarver subterfuge
continues when he actively disseminates such a negative portrayal to the
electorate.
And he seems genuine in asserting that he hasn’t
decided publicly who to support. While he called Democrat incumbent Mayor Ollie Tyler a “fine leader,” at the same
time he said the city would “be a Detroit” in the near future because “the city
is in trouble,” which appears to cast doubt on her governance skills. It seems
unlikely he would vote for the city’s rival black political faction’s candidate
Democrat Parish Commissioner Stephen
Jackson, and while he has shown a streak of pragmatism in his legislative career
to back Republican initiatives from time to time, it might ask too much for him
to vote for either major GOP candidate, Republican businessman Lee Savage, and Republican retired
law enforcement officer Jim Taliaferro.
As Tarver heads the other major black faction in
Shreveport, whatever signal he gives could swing an election where the incumbent
has a plurality of support but soft at that, the Republicans split their base’s
support, and the other major black faction has had a difficult time getting its
adherents interested in Jackson. But if he gives the word publicly or otherwise,
whoever that name then stands a pretty good chance of making an inevitable
runoff.
No comments:
Post a Comment