Democrat Gov. John Bel Edwards
makes an incessant talking point about allegedly more conflict developing
between partisans in the Legislature. Of course, he defines “partisanship” in a
nonstandard way, coming when you disagree with him on something, but he is
correct in that Louisiana is evolving away from a more personalistic style of
politics to one more driven by issue preferences that has marked politics in
the nation’s capital for much of the national government’s existence.
But it seems another “Washington” aspect has crept
into Louisiana’s political scene, that being the unprecedented political
activism of First Lady Donna Edwards. Until
her family moved into the Governor’s Mansion, gubernatorial spouses, if ever
seen and heard, didn’t involve themselves in issuing political statements over
any controversial issue.
The two most recent prior spouses exemplify the behavioral trend up until the time of Donna Edwards. Even though he involved himself deeply in politics, and some even suggested him as a power behind the throne, during her term Raymond Blanco never made public statements about issues facing his wife Democrat former Gov. Kathleen Blanco. Having a full-time job as a university administrator, he limited himself in any direct connection otherwise to state government.
Republican former Gov. Bobby
Jindal’s wife Supriya during most of his time in office ran a foundation to
provide classroom educational materials – which, predictably, from
the left drew hyperventilating and meritless claims of impropriety – but like
Coach Blanco she never publicly weighed in on controversial issues of the day
during her spouse’s term. She also had young children to help shepherd that
would limit her public role.
However, Donna Edwards has broken this mold. A public
school teacher from a traditional school who took leave when her husband surprisingly
won office, early in his term she became one of the first faces
in the Louisiana Association of Educators’ “Thank a Teacher” campaign, with a
persistent web-based ad inviting viewers to click on to read her story. This effort
naturally serves as a backdrop for increasing funds for public education –
presumably some of that would show up in higher salaries that the union
aggressively pursues – and tries to build support for the union as a whole, which
has a distinct political agenda.
That’s an intrusion into education politics, but
fairly indirectly. On social media, she sometimes delves more deeply into political
conflicts. Her Facebook
site mostly contains platitudes about noncontroversial views, such as the value
of education, or supporting foster families, and the like. But then there are
posts such, as after the Legislature finally ended sessions this year, a resend
of her husband’s post that
asserted he had cut taxes and reduced spending, as well as another giving him
(sole, incorrectly; a Republican legislator actually carried the load on this one) credit for
teacher paid leave for adoptions.
While these recorded instances represent minor
forays into political proselytizing, they do go beyond what past first spouses
have done. But put in her front of a presumed sympathetic group, and a real
departure from past behavior emerges.
Last month, Donna Edwards spoke
to a Shreveport YWCA event about “empowering” women. She said she wished to
improve education and end human trafficking, issue preferences that surely have
achieved consensus in today’s society.
However, Edwards also lamented at length the
alleged “pay gap” between men and women, and said it must be addressed. Concerning
perhaps the greatest canard in American politics today, she apparently relies
upon data that looks only at the median earnings of full-time wage and salaried
workers. In fact, study after study, years in and year out, that takes a
comprehensive look at the issue, accounting for all factors that influence pay,
shows the “gap” disappearing
into statistical insignificance.
The “pay gap” is a myth, and that is a fact too
well publicized for her or her husband not to know it. Yet both persistently
bring it up as if it actually existed. If she wants to stump for an issue that
has brought considerable division to the Legislature every time her husband has
backed it, she can, but she politicizes the matter further by using misleading
data to create an issue where there is none.
That she brings more politics to the unofficial
first spouse role than did her predecessors is neither good nor bad but is
interesting. Especially interesting because of the irony involved: Gov. Edwards
decries what he sees as a drift towards “Washington” politics even as First
Lady Edwards embraces a role more in common with activist first ladies in Washington
(such as the one
who would serve in the Senate and win the popular vote for the presidency) than
with previous first spouses in Baton Rouge.
No comments:
Post a Comment