The Department
of Culture, Recreation, and Tourism has braced
itself for more budget cuts to parks in fiscal year 2019. This has led to
shorter operational hours (and some sites open only by appointment) and
deferred maintenance at the 22 parks and 19 historic sites. Already, parts of
many stay closed, and some amenities that generate revenue have fallen into
disrepair, creating a vicious cycle where the agency finds it harder to raise
money to fix these things.
Yet, to some degree, CRT officials and lawmakers
bear the blame for such problems by promoting an inefficient model. In 2012,
the Legislative Auditor released a report
that included suggestions on better running the operation. Five years later, at
best only lukewarm implementation of these has occurred.
Then, the auditor suggested better matching resources to utilization, pricing demand for services better, putting more money into maintenance, and sharing staffing wherever possible. It contrasted the revenue situation of Louisiana with Alabama, where funds gathered from operations covered 97 percent of the Yellowhammer State’s parks and historic site expenditures.
Now, Alabama has 21 state parks and seven historic
sites, compared to Louisiana’s 22 parks
and 19
historic sites – an increase of one total despite the budgetary crunch and with
the removal
of the former Hodges State Park from the system this year. Of the two kinds,
historic sites cost much higher per visitor. And, for FY 2018
Louisiana has taxpayers foot directly over 58 percent of costs, with dedicated
funds accounting for 31 percent and self-generated revenues form other sources
just 3.7 percent. Remarkably, the amount of budgeted self-generated revenues has
fallen only around $100,000 since FY 2011,
the data used for the audit, and the overall budget has dropped about $1.6
million or five percent.
Part of the problem comes from having too many
locations, with many relatively lightly visited. Using 2011 data, some parks average
perhaps 10 visitors a day, although few are geographically close to each other.
Some historic sites do cluster, and while the most lightly visited open now
only by appointment, for those open five days a week some attract as few as
just over 20 visitors a day.
However, fee
structures remain largely undifferentiated and likely underprice the market
for the more upscale amenities, as indicated by extraordinarily long waiting
lists that don’t discriminate between residents and out-of-state travelers.
Nor, contrary to the auditor’s recommendation, do parks collect fees on extras
like pool use. And resource sharing appears unplanned, happening in the breach
as attrition occurs.
While, like all other state agencies, the Office
of State Parks has a strategic
plan, twice the state has fashioned master plans for it, the last having expired
in 2012.
Perhaps the time has come to produce another that focuses on implementing the
audit’s recommendations more fully.
There’s no reason policy implementation and
changes to it can’t draw Louisiana’s parks and historic sites closer to
self-sustenance. Rather than ask for larger taxpayer handouts or let matters deteriorate
further, the state should pursue this strategy.
No comments:
Post a Comment