Louisiana legislators seem poised to fix a curiously known omission that promises a boost to state political parties.
Additionally, it made presidential nominations and political party parish and state governance body elections also subject to this option. This means that parties can allow only those registered with the party to vote in these primaries. Louisiana would join eight other states with this arrangement.
The Louisiana Department of Education, already with its foot on the pedal, just put it to the metal.
Last week, the state’s elementary and secondary education delivery stayed on a roll, it was announced. Using the latest national test data and other sources, a consortium of higher education research arms declared that, after previously ranking first among states in reading growth and second in math growth from 2019 to 2024, Louisiana once again earned the top national ranking for growth from 2022 to 2025. Specifically, it is the only state in the nation to surpass 2019 pre-pandemic achievement levels in both reading and math as the only state to exceed those levels in reading and one of only two states nationally to do so in math.
The formula hasn’t changed that has led to this success: a back-to-basics emphasis, plus targeted interventions to shore up areas of weakness, with a reduction of regulations and procedures that interfere with teaching and pursuing proactive initiatives. This week, a lot of that came together in a new development.
Reform-minded Republicans thought attaching beneficial constitutional amendments to a red-hot Republican Senate primary election this year would push these items to victory after some similar measures met with defeat last year. But the left’s heckler’s veto won out.
For the spring of 2025, the Republican-led legislature forwarded four items to voters – the first springtime election for amendments in well over three decades. The only measures on the ballot in many parts of the state, in others sharing only with local races and items, they met with big defeats.
That happened for two reasons. First, augmented with loads of money coming from outside the state in opposition from the political left – which didn’t want to see fiscal reform that would reduce the size of government as well as blanching at criminal justice reform based on tougher measures – the left skillfully found fissures, creating mountains out of molehills, among conservatives to peel some support from them. Second, in recent years conservatives had larger turnouts in higher-stimulus elections, and for most of the state this was about as low-stimulus an election as you could get.
Conservatives had as many reasons to register disappointment as satisfaction at the results of May 16 elections.
Sure, they might be pleased at the Republican Senate semi-closed primary election outcomes. That saw incumbent Sen. Bill Cassidy draw just a quarter of the partisan electorate’s vote, an abysmal showing that had him become the first reigning senator knocked out in a party primary in 14 years.
This would boost conservatives’ morale because the result eliminated an unreliable, inconsistent conservative. Intellectually lazy analysis attributes Cassidy’s failure to make the Jun. 27 runoff solely to his vote to convict GOP Pres. Donald Trump on specious impeachment charges just after Trump left office in 2021, causing a backlash among Republican voters.
