While state Sen. Yvonne
Dorsey-Colomb frets that The
Colomb Foundation, founded by her husband, surely should not be on this
list, blaming a lack of documentation provided – that was first requested 18
months prior – on “office moves,” in fact the organization has a history of
failure to provide proper legal documentation regarding what it holds itself
out to be. According to its corporate
filing with the state, it began in 2004, predating her marriage to him, and
currently is in good standing with the state.
But the problem is, if we take it at its word, it never has been in
good standing with the Internal Revenue Service. The group solicits donations
and on its website at the appropriate page
states, “We are a 501(c)(3) non-profit, meaning that your contribution of time
or money will be tax deductible.” In order to achieve this, a group must secure
from the IRS a letter of determination, and then to stay in good standing must
follow a regular schedule of reporting.
Yet according to Guidestar, a
nonprofit organization that tracks nonprofits with particular attention paid to
section 501(c)(3) charitable organizations with its collection of these groups’
various kinds of Form 990
submitted to the IRS, not once in its history has it done so. This reporting is
not optional. Unless the organization files in a consolidated fashion as a
subsidiary of a larger one, regulations dictate that it must file this statement
that covers income, expenditures, assets, liabilities, officer and organization
information, and donor statistics and information about large donors. Smaller
groups in terms of resources may have to report only the most basic names and
numbers.
Guidestar also has access to whether a letter of determination has been
issued and its date. It also does not report any of this information for the
Foundation. That does not necessarily mean that no letter of determination once
had been issued to it. IRS regulations state that a group must have this
available for public inspection, and this may be available upon request from it,
while Guidestar may not have picked up on it if the group never filled out some
kind of Form 990 at any time.
It is possible that Guidestar, which gets from the IRS every single 990
submission, somehow missed getting a form from this group, or that the IRS
somehow neglected to include a form from it. But this happening nine years in a
row seems beyond chance, and IRS records indicate as such.
That’s because failure to file for three consecutive years means
revocation of any charitable status. As
IRS records show, on May 15, 2010 the Foundation
had it tax exempt status revoked for this very reason. This means that any individual
donor to the group who claimed a tax write off beyond the standard deduction,
or any corporate donor using donated funds to it as a tax shield, did not do so
legally. Of course, without having filed a Form 990 of some kind, there’s no
way of knowing about specific donations.
But information about donations in the aggregate can be deduced, for the Foundation did, even if belatedly almost
every year, file reports with the Louisiana Legislative Auditor because it was
receiving money in line item appropriations from the state. In these it lists for
fiscal year 2005
it received $60,000; in 2006
$2,107; in 2007
$100,000; in 2008
$300,000; in 2009
$137,389 (with all but $1 spent on capital outlay for a building); in 2010
$117,511 (all spent plus the previous dollar asset on capital outlay for the
building); and in 2011
$361,588. The Foundation is late again in violation of statute by not having a
FY 2012 report yet submitted. In the last year, money for operating expenses ($86,514)
came from a line item while the remainder came from the Treasury and Baton
Rouge. And in all of these, it asserted that 100 percent of its funding
directly or (as in FY 2011) indirectly came from the State of Louisiana.
So this perhaps explains why the group seems to have felt it never had
to file IRS reports: it never seriously worked as a charity and existed only to
siphon off money from the state. Yet the group still publicly holds itself out
as a legal tax-deductible charity, which it cannot legally do, even as it never
had accepted apparently a single donation. It also continues to assert its
charitable status in the latest documents filed with the LLA. Note also that its
neglect to file IRS reports from 2004-09 leaves it open to a fine of $30,000
for the IRS, but its LLA statements, which show is has spent every cent ever
received, do not show a fine payment nor the possibility of a fine as a contingent
liability.
3 comments:
Don't you wonder why our outstanding Governor continues to allow these types of corruptive gifts to be made?
He has the LINE ITEM VETO, and he often uses it!
But not for these NGOs.
[Answer: They help him BUY votes - just like it always has been done.]
Now, that's our farsighted Reformer!!!!!
So, when he says there is not enough money for your local university or hospital, call him up and remind his of the Columb Foundation.
Jindal won't do a damn thing to reform this. In fact, NGO expenditures have INCREASED under his administration, just more of them are hidden in Capital Outlay rather than being put in the Operating Budget as before.
Thanks for this thoughtful post. Colomb Foundation's accountant is filing all of the late 990's along with paperwork to reinstate 501(3)(c) status. Their auditor performed annual audits--their books are very simple as expenses are low--but he assumed that Sterling Colomb was filing the Federal 990 and did not ask about it. Mr. Colomb has no training in accounting or law and assumed, because his organization had been qualified by the IRS letter, that nothing more was needed with respect to Federal tax laws. I think most of us might assume the same. Ignorance of the law, of course, is not a legal defense but it does prove moral exoneration. There was no intent to willfully ignore IRS red tape.
You should also recognize that the Colomb Foundation was created to honor his daughter who was a victim of the south Louisiana serial killer (we don't mention the bastard's name) and his wife who had recently died of breast cancer. To say the least, he was in an "emotional state" when setting up the organization and obviously at risk of overlooking details when trying to learn out how to set up and run a non-profit. Everyone in the Lafayette area knows the Colomb Foundation well. It runs a number of women's safety awareness campaigns (SAVE -- Stay Alert and Vigilant Everywhere -- being the best known) as well as breast cancer screening campaigns and mailings.
They filed every one of the executive order state "reports" (BA-220 forms, etc.) that Kennedy claimed were not filed. They have the paperwork to show that they were filed. Kennedy's office lost the documents. Period. The Colomb Foundation has been waiting to resend them to him because Kennedy's office seemed confused about what else they "needed." He's finally gotten around to sending a list of what he wants and will soon have replacements for the documents his office lost.
Post a Comment