Mainstream journalism has evolved into often promoting
an agenda through news stories employing implication and innuendo. A recent
story about leadership at Louisiana State University provides an apex example.
This month, the LSU System gained a new president
in former McNeese State University Pres. Wade Rousse, and a new LSU Baton Rouge
chancellor in former University of Alabama Provost James Dalton. The LSU Board of Supervisors, a
near-majority of whom have been appointed by Republican Gov. Jeff Landry along
with its presiding officer, made the selections and in the process split the
job from its previously combined status under William Tate IV, who left and took
with him a few others to the Rutgers University system early in Landry’s term.
The Baton Rouge Advocate’s Tyler Bridges penned
a story related to this, which also broadly looked at recent university head
honcho appointments. Purporting to reveal the role Landry had in this, it slyly
pushed a narrative that not only did Landry have a large influence over the
process but also it was extensive to the point that it may be detrimental to
academic accreditation by alleged politicization of the process.
Bridges ran this argument in two ways. One was by
framing the process as deviant compared to past searches, especially with Tate.
Landry was described as telling some supervisors that he thought Rousse would do
well and said he didn’t go so far as did his predecessor Democrat former Gov. John Bel Edwards in
Tate’s selection, pointing out that Edwards previously had hosted South
Carolina officials including Tate and supervisors at the Governor’s Mansion and
lauded Tate.
This assertion of Edwards favoritism Bridges
attempted to torpedo with comments made by Edwards’ commissioner of administration
Jay Dardenne, who had applied for the job, by Robert Dampf, an Edwards’ loyalist
who was board chairman then and was replaced recently by Landry, and by Edwards
himself, denying that. But the facts of the search paint a very different
picture.
In an initial
list of over two dozen including Dardenne, Tate wasn’t on the list. In a narrowed
list of eight, he wasn’t there. But
suddenly, lo and behold at the Supervisors meeting to vet the eight Tate – who never had headed a university
system much less a university system – was added to the list and interviewed on
the spot, leading to him appearing on a semifinalist list that included then-University
of Louisiana System head Jim Henderson Anybody experienced in academia will
tell you this sequence of events is a hallmark of a forced selection; late in
the process the headhunter
firm was told to cull its files or contacts and find someone who fit a profile,
in this case likely a minority with a background in administration or research
involving diversity, inclusion, and equity issues, to match the governor’s
agenda.
Surprise: days later, Tate gets it, with Dampf
calling him a “great leader.” Of course, he and Edwards won’t admit publicly the
latter’s role in the process – and, curiously, Bridges’ story was entirely incurious
about these details which kicks the props out of its argument. By comparison,
Landry’s role in Rousse’s hiring seems quite modest.
As it also seems with the hiring at the University
of Louisiana Monroe of new president Louisiana native Carrie Castille. The story
also alludes to Landry’s praising Castille to corral her over Louisiana Delta
Community College’s one-time interim chancellor Chris Broadwater. But it
neglects to mention Castille’s extensive higher education career while Broadwater
had been in that business only a few years (currently a corporate lawyer for a
business with an extensive history of state contracts), after resigning from
the House of Representatives midway through Edwards’ first term as it had
become clear his loyalty to Edwards was costing him influence among his fellow
Republicans who controlled the chamber. Although the final vote is not public, it’s
likely that Edwards appointees on the University of Louisiana Board of
Supervisors got him in the race and almost pushed him past the finish line.
The other tack Bridges takes is to hint that
Landry’s involvement was extensive enough to threaten accreditation of state
colleges by the Southern
Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges for
politicization, quoting Dardenne to back that up. However, that judgement is
entirely validated when reviewing how SACSCOC
investigated a charge that Florida Republican Gov. Rick DeSantis
interfered with the hiring of The New College of Florida’s president, which on
the surface indicates much more involvement by him than in the accusations against
Landry. SACSCOC reaffirmed nothing untoward happened, but if Bridges bothered
to gather that information in assessing the claim, inappropriately either he sat
on it or his editors removed it.
Thus, the article tries to insinuate that Landry’s role in the hirings
were problematic. That tells us more about the general mainstream media’s antipathy
towards Landry than actually providing enlightenment on the incident.