Recently, Landry announced
his intentions to run for a second term, and (insert here customary
declaration the statement that follows next is certainty unless the candidate in
question gets caught with a live boy or dead girl) is pretty close to a lock to
winning that. In part, it’s because of the historic nature of his first three
years in office.
Until Landry assumed the Department of Justice
helm by defeating seasoned two-term incumbent Republican Buddy Caldwell,
Louisiana attorney generals had a marginal role in defining the exercise of
state government power. Constitutionally,
the officer mainly deals with civil law, although a district attorney or court
may invite him to deal with criminal matters. Statute also gives him a variety of
powers not inconsistent with these in the Constitution.
Previous attorney generals typically acted as allies of the governor, almost always because they didn’t differ much philosophically from them. If anything, past officeholders’ greatest acts of policy import came in decisions whether to prosecute alleged civil offenders, with an eye towards gaining reelection allies. Thus, Louisiana became known as a jackpot justice state, with populist motives in place for going after judgments against large corporations that could result in awards distributed to special interests.
Caldwell, who served his first term as a Democrat,
largely fit this mold so his interests didn’t really clash with the governor
during his terms, Republican former Gov. Bobby
Jindal. But the conservative Landry took office with current liberal Democrat
Gov. John Bel Edwards,
with whom he differed substantially ideologically.
This has led to Landry – always successfully – to challenge
legally Edwards’ overreach of executive power on several issues, making him the
first attorney general in nearly nine decades to try to enforce limitations by
law or the Constitution on the exercise of state government power. With limited
government increasingly favored by the Louisiana electorate, Landry can point
next year’s voters to a string of such examples, and this forms the basis for a
strong reelection campaign.
Regardless, Landry should draw at least one high-profile
challenger among Democrats term-limited in the Legislature in a bid to continue
their political careers. Three names have prompted some discussion as opponents:
state Sens. Eric LaFleur and JP Morrell and state Speaker Pro-Tempore
Walt Leger.
The senators don’t seem likely bets. Morrell is a political
legacy in New Orleans, with his father having served in the state House and now
as Clerk of Criminal Court and his mother previously on the City Council, and
his future lies in securing a full-time office there. LaFleur has well-paying
gigs as the state’s most prominent municipal bond attorney and as the attorney for Ville
Platte, jobs which he would have to surrender if becoming Attorney General.
Leger is a different story. Nakedly politically
ambitious, he won election to the House just a few years after finishing law
school, and managed to become speaker pro-tem in his second term. Edwards tried
to push him as speaker for his final term, but the chamber’s majority GOP rebuffed
him for one of their own.
But insofar as Orleans Parish politics goes, he
has no place to go. White in a majority black city, any quality black candidate
(such as Morrell) will defeat him for any city/parish-wide office, the state
Senate, or for Congress. Even his city council district is majority black.
While his House district is majority black, he won’t be able to replicate that
success in other jurisdictions.
So, he will make some statewide run as a last chance
to hold onto power, and with his background attorney general seems most
probable as the office. And he would compete well, but he would lose statewide to
any quality Republican, much less to one with Landry’s credentials and demonstrated
past campaign skills.
Thus, Landry won’t have an easy time of it, but
expect him to extend Democrats’ woes, who excepting for Edwards’ shock win in
2015 have lost every single statewide contest in the past decade.
No comments:
Post a Comment