Peterson, not exactly known for her tact, subtlety, or
deep knowledge of the issues, has a history of making extraordinarily partisan,
half-baked statements. She has flown
into a rage over a birthday cake and manufactured stories about it, rudely treats fellow legislators in violation of decorum, and gets into a huff about
perceived sexism by a Republican legislator yet could
not bring herself to condemn unconditionally the actions of a fellow Senate
Democrat who admitted to violent behavior towards a woman.
Her latest individual moment of brilliance comes surrounding
statements made by Democrat Rep. Maxine Waters. The almost-octogenarian
from California recently called upon activists
to harass publicly political opponents, specifically those working for the
Republican Pres. Donald
Trump Administration.
Few elected Democrats offered support for that sentiment. Most, like her boss House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, rejected the notion that people be subjected to abuse for political affiliations with which someone disagrees.
Louisiana’s Rep. Cedric Richmond, who
happens to lead the Congressional Black
Caucus (Waters is black), gave Waters a tepid, lame
defense in saying she had not asked to incite violence against those officials
who disagreed with someone’s viewpoint. Of course, that dodged the entire
issue: Waters still urged confrontations designed to impact negatively the
private, personal lives of people, whether than included any physical violence.
Richmond does not hold an official party office. However,
Peterson does, and also appears to believe in Stalin’s dictum that to make an omelet,
you have to break some eggs. A prolific Twitter user, Peterson sent out a
series of posts
defending Waters. Her main point seemed that Waters deserved robust defense
because she did things such as supporting policies that allegedly helped
families and children, and Peterson also questioned why few Democrats in
leadership positions acted reluctant to defend her.
Which goes to show just how ill-informed and pathetically
wrong are both Waters and Peterson. For example, if Waters really wanted to help
families with children, she would stop stumping for a job-killing minimum wage
of $15 hourly and promote government policy that creates jobs and encourages
work, something she steadfastly has refused to do throughout her legislative career.
(Not to mention that the wealthy
Waters, when introducing such minimum wage bills, wouldn’t
even pay her congressional interns, following the lead of most Democrats in
the House of Representatives.)
The last thing Democrats need in a right-leaning state
like Louisiana is for their leader to legitimize harassment and escalate
incivility. While the party’s far left agenda never will attract many
conservatives, more moderate voters remain in play, some of whom perceive
public policy problems resulting from an inability by political factions to
work together and will view Peterson’s drivel as encouraging more conflict.
Additionally, Peterson has proven to be a
miserable strategist. During her reign at the party’s top, Democrats have won
exactly one statewide race, putting Gov. John Bel Edwards into
office. Yet she initially rejected his candidacy and even
asked him to bow out at one point.
All current electoral signs point to incremental
Republican legislative gains in 2019 as well as an Edwards defeat. Absent extraordinary
political circumstances, there’s no hope of altering that destiny even if Peterson
shuts up, unless she steps down.
No comments:
Post a Comment