While he didn’t exactly treat Democrat Gov. John Bel Edwards as
if Louisiana’s chief executive didn’t exist, Republican House Speaker Taylor Barras did
make clear who called the shots over the state’s fiscal year 2019 picture and
beyond.
Late last year, Edwards declared
he wanted consensus with the Legislature by Jan. 19 on a package to reduce
a projected
budget deficit of around $1 billion, a gap mainly driven by the disappearance
of temporary taxes. With that in hand, he said he then would call for a February
special session to implement such a plan. The Legislature cannot raise taxes in
even-numbered years during the regular session that begins in March, and having
a special session after the regular session’s end in June would leave little
time to produce a comprehensive solution.
In making this demand, Edwards hopes to avoid continued
singular association with tax increases. By rushing the Republicans who control
the Legislature into signing onto this agenda by refusing to call a session for revenue-raising, he can deflect blame for
reelection purposes by reminding that a permanent, income tax-raising solution and
perhaps broadening the sales tax base to negate a nagging budget deficit came in
bipartisan fashion.
However, in a recent media interview, Barras would
not let Edwards off the hook. He realizes the emptiness of the threat not to
call a special session, for two reasons. Most obviously, the Legislature doesn’t
have to depend upon the governor to convene it, as it has the power to call
itself into special session. For example, with the regular session commencing
on Mar. 12, the special session could begin on Mar. 5, with the call petition
completed by Feb. 26 – more than a month after Edwards’ deadline. Better, this call can include spending reform measures Edwards unlikely would embrace.
The only fly in the ointment to this move comes
with Republican Sen. Pres. John Alario’s
fealty to Edwards. Yet given the choice between increasing the chance for chaos
just until the start of next fiscal year and forcing Edwards into an unpalatable
budgetary position, chances are Alario would go along with joining in a call,
which a majority of legislators can trigger.
Because if no such session is in the offing by
Jan. 26, Edwards must
present a budget with large expenditure cuts. Anything he produces makes
him a target for criticism, and without a way to qualify what he will produce
by appending to any discussion of that document changes that would occur as a
result of an imminent special session, he will bear the full brunt of negative
reaction, even if he yelps often that others should bear blame for not acceding
to his tax hike wishes. Hence, he chose a deadline a week ahead of time so he
could work that into budget appendices.
To his credit, Barras appears unconcerned about
bullying tactics designed to hand Edwards a political victory. Further, he
seems to understand that he can use this issue to trap Edwards into a nightmare
scenario for the governor’s agenda – not permanent tax increases largely on
corporations and on income, but permanent spending reductions with no tax
increases or, as a fallback position, in sales tax rates. Edwards desperately
wishes to avoid this one kind of tax hike, because while it would cause those
above lower class will pay the most by far, lower-income households will pay a
greater percentage of their earnings that way. If he accepts this, Edwards gets
tagged, even in an oversimplified fashion, as the governor who raised taxes on
the poor.
Time is on the side of Barras, not Edwards, in
this matter. So, in the interview he stated he did not feel bound by any deadline
and when House Republicans had something to offer, he would take it to Edwards
regardless of the date. As long as he remains steadfast and he can keep his
caucus in line, likely he will force Edwards into significant cuts tied to an expenditure
limit and a permanent rise of the sales tax, perhaps something like the
temporary one percent increase until Jun. 30 becoming a permanent half-percent
extra.
Of course, some RINOs seduced by Edwards still
prowl the House chambers that could spoil this strategy, but they have started
self-selecting themselves into leaving office and constituent pressures
with impending 2019 election may cause them to distance themselves from him.
Barras and the House leadership need to stand firm on this issue to block
Edwards’ persistent attempts to take Louisiana back to an ignominious past.
No comments:
Post a Comment