Jeffrey D. Sadow is an associate professor of political science at Louisiana State University Shreveport. If you're an elected official, political operative or anyone else upset at his views, don't go bothering LSUS or LSU System officials about that because these are his own views solely. This publishes five days weekly with the exception of 7 holidays. Also check out his Louisiana Legislature Log especially during legislative sessions (in "Louisiana Politics Blog Roll" below).
20.4.17
Remarks indicate LSU chief getting restless
He might as well take out a full page advertisement
announcing it: my singular uber-boss (although
he serves under two collective entities), Louisiana State University Pres. F.
King Alexander, apparently is on the market for a new job.
There seems no other way to explain comments
he made yesterday during a symposium regarding the intersection of race and
public policy. The main speaker, Baton Rouge Mayor-Pres. Sharon Broome, broached a number
of topics.
But at one point, Alexander interjected something
Broome hadn’t addressed: the 2015 petition by residents representing most of
the unincorporated area of East Baton Rouge, styling themselves as creating “St.
George,” to form their own municipality. Without prompting, Alexander
volunteered that “We worked together successfully about a year and a half ago
to make sure the city wasn't split in half” and then, by way of mentioning a
documentary that alleged racist motives behind the incorporation drive, asked
Broome how to prevent a similar future attempt. By law, no such try can occur
prior to this summer, an effort past organizers have signaled they will resume.
Disappointingly, Alexander made a factually
incorrect statement – the St. George movement did not seek to deconstruct Baton
Rouge in any way – but, worse, his remarks demonstrated some very ham-handed
politicking. By admitting open opposition to forming a new city and especially in
associating its ethos with a television program that cast racist aspersions
onto the founding of St. George, Alexander risked alienating a large base of support
for LSU in particular and higher education in general.
It certainly threw a new light onto his actions in
2014 to have LSU land outside city boundaries annexed into it, depriving a
future St. George of the opportunity to draw revenues from the parcel,
according to former Metro Councilman Ryan Heck. In a guest column
at The Hayride website, Heck wrote that he and others on the body suspected
that request came from antipathy to St. George, in that disqualifying this area
as part of the incipient city would make it appear less viable an entity, even
as Alexander explained he just wanted the entire campus under the same
jurisdiction.
As Heck pointed out, a number of lawmakers of
which the fate of LSU rests in their hands supported the ability of citizens to
form their own city, and Alexander’s comments, especially in signaling implicit
agreement with the thesis of racist undertones to the St. George matter, acted
as an insult of them. Further, Alexander’s remarks denigrated the potential LSU
donor base residing in the area that tried to incorporate; giving to LSU has
become a touchy subject of his presidency as LSU
and its system continue to lag almost all flagship universities and systems
in the country in fundraising, especially in per capita terms. Telling a large nearby pocket of alumni and/or actual
and potential donors they’re social pariahs for rebelling against unresponsive
government isn’t exactly the best way of rectifying that shortcoming.
However, he might impress one group with this
candor: hiring committees of university systems. Especially in areas that pride
themselves on adopting what they feel the most fashionable ideas, regardless
that fact and logic don’t support such notions, in their striving to achieve
trendiness such mandarins like to see their top officials spout rhetoric
consistent with the party line. Regurgitating the myth that racist
considerations play any significant role in public policy-making in America
today – and especially pernicious attempts that imply alternative explanations
to liberalism that more validly explain how the real world works are
illegitimate because these somehow connote a hidden form of “racism” – in much
of academia to its closed minds makes one look enlightened.
Thus, with his remarks either Alexander was trying
to pad his credentials for a move to a higher-paying gig elsewhere, particularly
in states with leftist elites in charge, or he’s exceptionally politically clumsy.
Considering the latter doesn’t inspire confidence in the minds of those who
employ him, either way he might not be long in his current position.
No comments:
Post a Comment