Jeffrey D. Sadow is an associate professor of political science at Louisiana State University Shreveport. If you're an elected official, political operative or anyone else upset at his views, don't go bothering LSUS or LSU System officials about that because these are his own views solely. This publishes five days weekly with the exception of 7 holidays. Also check out his Louisiana Legislature Log especially during legislative sessions (in "Louisiana Politics Blog Roll" below).
28.3.17
Same concerns then scuttle broadband project now
It’s déjà vu
all over again for a broadband access project in Louisiana that saw the same
mistakes repeated, leading to its demise both times.
Recently, the Louisiana Board of Regents announced
that it would not proceed with a plan to extend its high-speed broadband network
into the state’s school districts. It would have used its own funds, leveraged
with a 90 percent federal government match, to do this, but only a handful of
districts responded affirmatively to the offer by a deadline, so it withdrew the
offer.
Higher education and Department of Education
officials expressed uncertainty, if not disbelief, over why too few districts
seemed interested. But representatives of the districts argued that a lack of information
and compressed schedule made many districts hesitate.
This echoes the outcome of the Regents’ last foray
into managing a broadband project designed to leverage its resources beyond
higher education. In 2009, the American Reinvestment and Recovery Act, a
spending bill stumped to jumpstart the economy but which, if anything, did
the opposite, included something called the Broadband Technology Opportunity
Program. This threw federal cash onto entities to spend on initiatives to
increase broadband access.
Along with several executive branch agencies, the
Regents decided to make a grab for this money, eventually spawning a request
for $80.6 million to provide access to rural areas including schools, along
with over $14 million of state funds. They took the lead because of their oversight
of the Louisiana Optical Network Initiative,
a high-speed, high-capacity networking structure. However,
the Regents got the ball rolling slowly and matters became worse when the
contractor they hired seemed too relaxed and/or unable to handle the load in
the time allotted as well.
With a deadline approaching, former Gov. Bobby
Jindal’s Division of Administration stepped
in to restructure the program, raising even more questions to the federal
government, which had a distinct set of political objectives it wanted the
grant to fulfill and would not budge on the timeline, as the former Pres. Barack Obama
Administration faced
a losing battle to make the spending bill turn out an economic success and
needed accomplishments immediately to produce that impression. With an
impossibly short window for delivery and all the chaos up to that point, it
collapsed into program termination, one
of only two out of 223 authorized to suffer this fate.
In retrospect, the Jindal Administration made the
right call to assume control late in the game to safeguard state funds, even if
this meant letting the federal government scrap the idea. It recognized the
bureaucratic-centric structure created a host of problems – a similar approach concerning
emergency response networks in Mississippi
started slowly, then got caught up in changing policy emphases that has left
this unfinished project scheduled for completion in three years, almost a
decade behind schedule – and wanted to enter into lease arrangements to have
the infrastructure built more quickly.
Note how the conditions remain the same – lack of information
coming from the Regents and a compressed timeline on accomplishing things
combining to scuttle the notion. Apparently, lessons went unlearned from years
ago.
Perhaps that won’t happen a third time. As it
seems the Regents wished to apply for a Universal
Service Program for Schools and Libraries grant, this becomes open for applications every year (although
this has a cap on total assistance offered that could fill up), if it wishes to
try again next year it may – although the public may wonder, with all of the
complaining in recent years about cuts in taxpayer subsidization of higher
education why it might wish to divert several million dollars to this effort – it
has that option.
In particular, schools would have to understand their
discounted rate obligation going forward, which may not make the program cost
effective beyond initial infrastructure costs. If the Regents can meet these
concerns, then perhaps the third time will turn out as the charm.
No comments:
Post a Comment