Jeffrey D. Sadow is an associate professor of political science at Louisiana State University Shreveport. If you're an elected official, political operative or anyone else upset at his views, don't go bothering LSUS or LSU System officials about that because these are his own views solely. This publishes five days weekly with the exception of 7 holidays. Also check out his Louisiana Legislature Log especially during legislative sessions (in "Louisiana Politics Blog Roll" below).
6.3.17
Nuisance jackpot justice suits finally may disappear
Finally, the tunnel has light at the end, regarding
the nuisance suit attempted by a once-rogue state subdivision that sought
jackpot justice to fund coastal protection.
A panel
of the U.S Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals agreed
with a lower district court that the Southeast
Louisiana Flood Protection Authority-East lacked standing to bring suit
against nearly 100 energy firms for alleged environmental damage they caused. A
few years ago the agency, a subdivision of the state, hired lawyers on contingency
to try to collect possibly billions of dollars with a poison pill in that
contract stating if its board dropped the suit it owed expenses that could
reach into the eight figures.
Prior members of the SLPAE-E board, despite disputes
over whether companies had acted illegally or negligently, whether the state
had felt they had acted illegally or negligently in the past, or how much, if
any, damage the energy extractors actually caused, saw these entities as piñatas ready to bust
to fund agency activities. After they brought suit, Republican former Gov. Bobby
Jindal when their terms expired began replacing members supportive of the
action with others who took a more circumspect approach to government activism.
Eventually, lawmakers enacted a measure to moot the suit, giving the state
control over any such maneuvers.
Faced with the possibility of a huge payout with
no payoff by withdrawal, the board – even as a majority now likely would not
approve of the suit, with enough of the renegade members (and their questionable
hidden agendas) off the panel – kept up the legal actions, trying to steer
the matter into state court but finding it properly headed into the federal
judiciary. With the same dilemma at hand, the board likely will either ask the
entire Fifth Circuit to hear the case or have it head to the Supreme Court,
where it probably would end up anyway after the full bench heard it. By then,
the Court likely will have a full complement with Judge Neil Gorsuch joining it
from the Tenth Circuit, and his history suggests he would
make a majority looking dimly at the agency’s case.
For that reason, counsel might throw in the towel
knowing it can’t win, ending this nightmare distraction and eating its costs
regardless. The main former board member instigator of the suits, the
long-deposed John Barry, signaled
throwing in the towel on his hopes by commenting he saw value in the
publicity his wasteful scheme generated.
Yet even if this happens, a number of suits still
remain, filed by parishes in state courts, an allowed practice under state law.
The specter of jackpot justice also haunts here, in the form of Democrat Gov. John Bel Edwards, who as
state legislator proved one of trial lawyers’ staunchest allies and prior to
ascending to the state’s highest office implied the state
should pursue vigorously suits blaming energy extraction firms for
environmental damage as a way of attracting federal funding for coastal
restoration. He has had his office join these suits
Fortunately, the Louisiana Constitution provides a
check here in the form of the Attorney General, Republican Jeff Landry. It allows him to
intervene
and take control of cases such as these, and he has. Landry brings a much
different mentality to the job, a balanced view that seeks to hold companies accountable
if they clearly broke the law and subverted agreements with the state and local
governments (although even this may not end up as a sufficient reason to award
damages, as in some cases government may have failed to enforce the law and
thereby made itself as liable) but rejects the notion that the energy industry
waits like fatted calf ready for slaughter to finance state objectives.
At this point, if Landry’s office proceeds with
this mindset, few if any of these suits should pan out. Thus, it looks as if
policy-makers’ infatuation with hoping for rainmakers to shower money down on
them largely will wear off, and the best agent to direct policy in this area, this
state, will face no interference from subgovernments in doing so while oil and
gas companies can concentrate on doing what they do best, responsibly enriching
Louisiana.
No comments:
Post a Comment