Jeffrey D. Sadow is an associate professor of political science at Louisiana State University Shreveport. If you're an elected official, political operative or anyone else upset at his views, don't go bothering LSUS or LSU System officials about that because these are his own views solely. This publishes five days weekly with the exception of 7 holidays. Also check out his Louisiana Legislature Log especially during legislative sessions (in "Louisiana Politics Blog Roll" below).
8.12.16
LA legislators seeing through expansion snow job?
The Medicaid expansion con job perpetrated on
Louisiana by the Democrat Gov. John Bel Edwards
Administration continues to unravel, as confirmed
in yesterday’s preliminary budget hearings by the House Appropriations
Committee.
The Department of Health’s request for $14.6
billion for fiscal year would, in terms of operating expenses, vacuum up
half of the state’s spending. From the beginning of former Republican Gov. Bobby
Jindal’s terms, this more than doubles that amount of a decade ago
(including charity hospital costs), both in overall
spending and in the amount of general
fund dollars expended.
But LDH Secretary Rebekah Gee insisted Medicaid
expansion had nothing to do with escalating state costs, saying almost all new
spending would come from federal dollars. Further, she alleged that expansion
had saved money this fiscal year – the oft-stated number being $184 million –
and according to this budget would cause a reduction of $41 million in general
fund spending over last year.
If committee members pondered such assertions,
they would see just how fast she tap-danced in making these. That leaves aside
discounting the fact that LDH
never has released any corroborating information on how it derived the savings
claim, in stark contrast to comprehensive Jindal Administration reports
that showed losses rather than savings from the start of expansion, with
hundreds of millions lost annually in just a few years. (Last week, I submitted
a public records request to LDH to produce this information; by law, I should
hear back from it next week.)
Yet even taking LDH at its word, the figures don’t
add up. The state portion of payment for expansion blended to 2.5 percent this
fiscal year. Next fiscal year it more than doubles to 5.5 percent, so how could
the general fund throw in $41 million fewer despite the state having to pick up
more of the tab – and a projected client increase in the 50,000 range? Supposed
“savings” come from reduced uncompensated care payments, but those effects
largely showed up in this initial year. Further, LDH reported earlier this year
that it had badly underestimated expansion costs by $376 million.
Much of the answer lies in two indirect channels
for money, self-generated funds and statutory dedications, which include things
such as the sick tax imposed on most hospitals at the beginning of this fiscal
year. These serve as indirect taxes on individuals, as providers hike their
rates to compensate and pass these along to ratepayers and clients, which
perhaps helps to explain massive
health insurance premium escalations for next year in Louisiana’s public
exchange and as well significantly
higher rates in group markets. And it does not include other changes such
as higher deductibles and co-payments, which are reflected in the increasing
proportion of median household income that goes to health care expenditures,
that now cost
Louisiana households nearly 12 percent of that, about two percent above the
national norm and an increase of 2.3 percent since passage of health care reform.
For these two sources of revenues, actual numbers
from FY 16 compared to projected FY 18 have gone up an astonishing $452 million
or 36.5 percent. Most of these SGF and dedicated new dollars have come from the
imposition of the sick tax and other fee increases and redirections in the past
two years. Next year’s projections call for an increase of $223 million over
this year’s.
That’s where Louisiana’s people pay for Medicaid
expansion – through channels obscuring that fact. The Edwards Administration
can try to hide the inconvenient truth that the state will pay more and, in an
aggregate sense, does not save money at all with expansion (and this does not
even count the extra tax/debt burden foisted upon Louisianans in paying their
portion of the federal share), but anybody thinking logically will realize the
misdirection in which it engages.
As the spending numbers mount, legislators finally
may have started waking up to the shell game practiced by Edwards on the issue
of Medicaid expansion. Now the question is what will they do about a program
crowding out other state priorities and taking more than ever of what
Louisianans earn without making the matter worse.
No comments:
Post a Comment