If last week did not contain in
aggregate the most momentous shift in Caddo Parish Commission policy in its
history, it must rank up there, generating plenty of controversy and optimism
for the future.
Four tremendous breaks from past
policy occurred, beginning with discussion
but no action on whether the parish will have its administrator Woodrow
Wilson serve as its representative on the Northwest Louisiana Council of Governments.
By federal law, that organization coordinates activities among local
governments relevant to federal government grant activities, among other
things.
Wilson has served as that official
until last month when new Commission Pres. Matthew Linn assumed the
position himself, with the power to designate a substitute. In a letter to
commissioners, Wilson complained about the move, saying that it would reduce
expertise and effectiveness of the organization and on the behalf of the
parish.
Wilson and Linn have had a rocky
relationship as a result of the reign
of former parish Animal Services and Mosquito Control director Everett Harris.
Wilson continually defended Harris, who he had known for many years prior to
his appointment eight years ago, even after numerous public complaints about
the department’s performance. Linn became the Commission’s most outspoken
critic of Harris, and by extension Wilson. After a bizarre social media
incident that launched an official investigation into Harris’ activities he
ended up resigning.
As justification, Linn pointed to a
change in federal regulations that took effect in 2014 in conjunction with incorporating
NLCOG that required local government representatives to be elected officials of
its governing authority and to resolutions naming the Commission president or
designee as the representative as the basis of his authority. Others thinking
that Linn’s action represents a vendetta against Wilson and a kind of power play
will contest this in court.
Essentially, the Commission parked the
issue in its work session, waiting for any legal outcome. While Linn and the
parish see a solid case for their interpretation, ultimately it may take a
court decision to settle the matter.
At the subsequent regular meeting, new
members Steven Jackson,
who had defeated Michael Williams; Mike Middleton, who had
defeated John Escude’; and Mario
Chavez, who had succeeded term-limited David Cox; led
a charge to stop
participation of commissioners in the Caddo Parish Employees Retirement System.
The matter now in litigation, according to the Louisiana Legislative Auditor
and fairly clearly stated in the Constitution, illegally
allowed commissioners to use taxpayer dollars to fund pension payments to
them.
All three formers members had
defended the arrangement to various degrees, so without their departures it would
have been unlikely that a majority could have been mustered to secure the
termination. However, the Commission did not go so far as to repudiate the
scheme in its entirety and to begin proceedings to recapture the taxpayer dollars
held in escrow or paid out to current and former members.
The newcomers also took the
initiative in passing an ordinance to delink
commissioners’ pay increases with those of parish employees and allow
participation in Social Security or an optional retirement system without
matching parish funds. This halts raises the part-time commissioners received whenever
rank-and-file parish employees got one, which increased regular members’
salaries nearly 240 percent in two decades to around $23,000 annually, far
exceeding comparable area officials’ pay.
The new commissioners did
not have the same success with lowering by about half money doled out to
the panel’s members for travel related to educational functions and
representing the Commission. Instead, at the work session the body shuttled the
proposal to a committee. In past years, commissioners
had come under fire for using up to $15,000 a year in reimbursable funds,
sometimes in living large at Carnival balls and conferences.
Now that these reforms have brought
or seem well on their way to bringing the parish into legal compliance and into
serving the public interest, let us hope history does not repeat itself. In
1996, several reformers – comprised of both the real thing and pretenders –
gained election as commissioners promising to bring excessive spending and
cronyism under control. Yet fewer than two decades later, the problems had
reappeared with some of those self-styled change agents contributing to these.
Voters need to retain vigilance over this current crew to ensure things turn
out differently over the next 20 years.
No comments:
Post a Comment