With Republican Rep. John Fleming formally
announcing that he will pursue the seat of retiring Sen. David Vitter, he vacates
his safe Fourth District post. That puts him up against Rep. Charles Boustany,
2014 candidate Rob Maness, and former
Rep. Anh “Joseph” Cao, and others that could join in include Treasurer John
Kennedy, state Rep. Paul Hollis,
and Public Service Commissioners Scott
Angelle and Eric Skrmetta,
all Republicans.
Democrats
could provide another north Louisiana option if the area's Public Service Commissioner
Foster Campbell enters the
race, as he presently contemplates. However, a Democrat
stands little chance of winning despite the recent upset that won former
state Rep. John Bel Edwards the governorship. Senate contests attract an
electorate more favorable to the GOP and bring to the forefront issues that in
recent decades have favored Republicans in races for Congress. What a serious
Democrat could do is make a runoff election and hand the highest-placed GOP
finisher in the general election the victory, unless lightning strikes twice.
Of the four declared candidates,
the lineup at this early junction would make Fleming the top vote-getter. He
has as a base all of the state north of Interstate 10 and more ideological
Republicans. Boustany can claim Acadiana and more voters to the center
(although solidly a conservative, somewhat less to the political right than
Fleming). Cao’s moderate term in the House could allow him to do decently well
in the New Orleans area and, in an all-Republican field, could make the runoff.
Even though he ran statewide two years ago as an anti-establishmentarian
conservative and got a respectable 12 percent of the vote, Maness would have
less appeal now than then because of Fleming’s unquestioned conservatism and the
congressman’s high-profile opposition to establishment politics in Washington,
rendering Maness a poor man’s version of the real deal.
Having a credible Democrat enter
only strengthens Fleming’s hand. That would reduce Cao to a non-entity and
siphon a few votes from Boustany with Fleming losing none of his support. The
only real threat he might face from an additional candidate comes in the form
of Kennedy, who has won his last three statewide contests with little or no
competition, has run two Senate campaigns before and has the best crossover
appeal of any potential candidate, and would become the favorite should he take the plunge. The other Republican entrants would eat less
into Fleming’s base than into those of the other announced candidates or
Democrats.
Fleming’s departure leaves the seat
open, with one likely entrant in the form of state Rep. Mike Johnson. That
would continue a whirlwind tour for him, having won a special election in 2014
unopposed, and doing the same last year. The Republican has gained national
headlines with his defense of religious liberty, but never having faced
opposition this would test his campaigning abilities.
Not that another possible entrant
into the contest, state Rep. Jim Morris, has had to campaign much lately. This
Republican, by contrast, slowly yet steadily has worked his way up the political
ladder, running as a reform conservative in 1995 for the Caddo Parish
Commission, then upon term limitation there moved up into the House in 2007.
But he has not had a competitive election since 1999.
Both face questions of their electability.
Johnson’s unabashed support of a socially conservative agenda may rankle some voters
and activists and overshadows his other conservative issue preferences, making
his short legislative career seem one-dimensional.
Morris aligned himself with a legislative
faction called the “budget hawks,” who made much noise about reforming the state’s
budget process and mentality in the shadow of chronic budgetary shortfalls. But
to date the group has proved unserious by steadfastly refusing to introduce or to
support legislation that speaks to the underlying disease, a budget hamstrung
by far too many dedications and too little will by legislators to make necessary
spending choices, Morris included. As such, and with another of its members contemplating
running for Boustany’s place, those involved in the group seem more engaged in
a public relations exercise with electoral ambitions in mind than in genuine
policy solutions.
No comments:
Post a Comment