The gubernatorial term limitation already
has the current lieutenant governor, a current Public Service Commissioner, and
a state representative ready to rumble for that office (and a sitting U.S.
senator). For the vacated lieutenant governor’s post, a big-city mayor, a recently-retired
parish president, a continuing parish president, and a state senator have
pledged they’ll run. A former congressman looks to take on the current attorney
general for that post. None are term limited.
Regardless of limits, potential
candidates often feel an imperative to run for something for other reasons of
timing. They may feel if they aspire to such an office if they wait longer they
may get too old to run effectively, or that the near-term dynamics of the
contest may be less favorable to them in the future than in the present.
But term limitation definitely
seems to impact the expression of House of Representatives Speaker Chuck Kleckley
for running
for state treasurer. Limited in the House, if he wants to keep a full-time
gig in politics, statewide elected office is the only place he can head as of
now (or perhaps at the local level as Lake Charles mayor). However, that would
put him up against the most stalwart of current officeholders, Treasurer John
Kennedy who is completing his fourth term – if it weren’t for the fact that
Kennedy is thinking of fleeing that post for attorney general.
Kennedy is a two-time frustrated
Senate candidate but a move such as this also would meant he twice went for
attorney general, having run in 1991 but getting edged out of the runoff.
Having been a top official in the office of former Gov. Buddy Roemer, he later
caught on as Secretary of the Department of Revenue before claiming the
Treasurer’s spot in 1999. A lawyer by training, this quest would represent
nothing new to Kennedy.
Yet it might be as quixotic a quest
as what he seemingly had been gearing up to do, run for governor. Kennedy is more
a populist than principled conservative and could have slid into that slot in
that contest, except that candidate Sen. David
Vitter has the unusual ability to attract votes from both of these wings of the
party. But that spot for attorney general may be taken already by former Rep. Jeff Landry as he battles Atty.
Gen. Buddy Caldwell. While both are
Republicans, Caldwell is a relatively recently switcher and some of this
actions in office have tended to support agendas and interests more typically
aligned with Democrats.
Kennedy also switched parties in
2007, after his 2004 Senate run where he tried to position himself as a
liberal. If no Democrat gets into the race, it’s possible that he could wedge
himself between the other two unless he returns to his roots by adding a swath
of liberal populism to his arguments that might squeeze out Caldwell and make
him look closer to the center in a runoff with Landry. However, this strategy
gets mooted if a Democrat enters the race, so his going all in to this particular
contest represents something of a gamble – especially with Vitter making
favorable noises about Landry that could make him the preferred conservative
and populist candidate. Either way, Caldwell ends up the loser with Kennedy
eating more into his base – especially if the Great
Dane sprints to the left – than into Landry’s.
If Kennedy opts for the safety of a
fifth term, apparently even the likes of Kleckley would not run against him;
going up against a four-term incumbent with (at the end of 2013) some $3
million in the bank would daunt anyone. And, given his penchant for throwing
out advice about governing where he can claim a fiscal connection given his
current post and the positions it enables him to hold, such as being chairman
of the State Bond Committee, it would appear that Kennedy actually would take a
step back in influence over public policy by sliding over to attorney general.
Regardless that he would face a
tougher road to election and probably diminish his policy-making impact, it’s whatever
turns your crank on these matters. Such a lateral attempt by him would really
make things interesting as it would guarantee three new officeholders and
increase the odds of a fourth, compared to the last election cycle that
produced none. So if you like more variety, root for him to take it.
No comments:
Post a Comment