It’s hard to blame UNO, battered as
it has been by the aftermath of the hurricane disaster of 2005. Not only the considerable
physical damage done to the campus that prevented holding
traditionally-delivered classes for months and cost so much to repair that
siphons money still, but also and worse were the demographic changes that
sapped enrollment. UNO was designed explicitly to serve as an urban university
geared towards non-traditional students, and when that market became somewhat
hollowed by the disaster, enrollment tumbled and today is barely half of where
it was a decade ago, exacerbated by the ongoing effort to right-size the
overbuilt higher education sector in Louisiana, which shifted more
revenue-raising to tuition rather than from taxpayers, making enrollment an
even bigger factor in funding.
As a result, the school engaged in
a self-study to determine which programs to retain or to restructure in order
to bring costs more in line with identifiable revenue generating activities.
That report has been issued, with the president Peter Fos to deliver the final
recommendations to the University of Louisiana System in December. A couple of
dozen programs are recommended to be reconfigured, and a few eliminated.
One is the political science Ph.D.
From a distance, I have seen the department get whittled down by the unfavorable
confluence of the disaster and that a key core of faculty members then were at
the point that retirement seemed preferable shortly after Katrina hit, rather
than dealing with the huge headaches ahead, for which they should receive no
blame. This made it more difficult to deliver the doctorate, as well as to
attract both faculty members to teach in it and for students to choose it. By
way of background, in Louisiana there is one private school with the degree in
New Orleans, Tulane, and two public schools in Baton Rouge with it, Louisiana State
and Southern (although the latter’s degree technically is in a related field,
Public Policy).
By these metrics, it well may make
sense to shut down the program, which would not happen for several years in any
event as all students presently in it would be allowed to complete their
degrees. Yet I think there is a case to keep it, when weighing other factors such
as mission and the ability to reap cost savings in other areas.
Principally, the state and New
Orleans area can use and have benefitted from having this program. While most
similar programs across the country are of a traditional mold – having
full-time students coming right out of bachelors and masters programs in
political science from across the country – UNO’s typically had a higher proportion
of non-traditional and part-time students, partly because of the university’s
mission, partly because of its young status (it’s only about 40 years old)
where “traditional” students were drawn first to other established departments and
programs with (the guiding rule in academia for terminal degrees being not so
much actual teaching or research merit but) reputations. Without trying to
oversimplify or distort the nature of program as exemplified by its students
with their varied life stories and motivations, among Ph.D. programs in
political science it had more of a blue- than white-collar background.
Consider this fairly representative
example. A guy comes to New Orleans with a Masters of Business Administration
degree from a prestigious university to work for a bank holding company. But
after a while he begins to discover he’s less interested in overseeing that bank
official items are processed correctly and more interested in his undergraduate
studies in political science. So he considers doing graduate work in that area
while working full time, to see what’s up.
There’s Tulane, for which he met
the entrance requirements, although it’s really pricey and, having paid for his
own schooling to this point, which he rather would avoid shelling out so much
for if possible. And if he decided to chuck his business career and go into
academia, there’s the issue of what the department would think of his having an
MBA and not an M.A. in political science, which could mandate many more courses
being taken at high cost (although chances were excellent he could secure a
stipend, at least eventually, to pay for some or all of that) or even
reluctance to let him in the program because of that.
And then there’s UNO, with much
less expensive instruction as well as seemingly being a jewel in the rough; in
that era, it turned out that UNO’s political science faculty had one of the
highest per capita research publication
rates in the country. Better, it offered many of its courses at night for a
working stiff like him. So he went in that direction.
A year later, he went on full assistantship
and left banking to pursue full-time study, joining among others who had made the
same choice a former librarian and lawyer. Three years later, he had his first
faculty gig, before even graduating a year after. A quarter of a century later,
he had taught thousands of students, published a few things here and there,
made lots of presentations at scholarly conferences, become a source in his
area of expertise that got him quoted in a dozen national newspapers, two national
television networks, several foreign newspapers and broadcasters, besides all
sorts of state and local media, authored ongoing opinion columns printed/posted
in several outlets around the state, and wrote an award-winning blog on Louisiana
politics now running nearly a decade. And even infamous enough to have this done to him.
OK, you know this guy. But there
are many others who share this degree with me who also have made substantive
contributions inside and outside of academia. I use in one of my classes the
textbook a couple
co-authored (with a UNO department member). Another pair co-authored the (to
date) definitive
work on voting behavior in New Orleans in the post-civil rights era.
Another has featured with me in the academic debate about the legacy of David
Duke on the impact of voting behavior as it related to Gov. Bobby
Jindal. Those are just the projects I have been connected to at least in a
small way. And I’m not the only one of us used as a media source in the
state.
And what you may not know is the
profound impact on the instruction of political science at Louisiana universities
that UNO political science Ph.D.s have had. While it changes every year, for
most of the past 20 years among the political science faculties in state
schools, the pedigree most prevalent has been UNO’s. More broadly, off the top
of my head, nationwide (and worldwide) I can think of two dozen program graduates teaching at the
university level, and a couple of more who once did but no longer do so.
Personal histories and testimonies
aside, by offering a Ph.D. in political science, UNO has met a need. Not only
does the program have a history of attracting and graduating students that, for
reasons of personal circumstances, may not otherwise have been in position to
pursue these studies otherwise, but it also enabled them to become contributors
to the profession and their communities, in Louisiana in particular. Surely it’s
a niche that this program of study can continue to serve, if properly
reinvigorated, that also can make economic sense.
This space has argued more
forcefully than any other from within Louisiana higher education about the need
to induce efficiency into the state’s higher education delivery, including
pruning academically suspect, duplicative, and less-needed programs as part of
that. Nonetheless, and regardless that I am a 1990 Ph.D. graduate of UNO in
political science, I can’t help but think the merits of continuing the degree
outweigh its costs. Thus, the ULS Board, and the Board of Regents should strive
to reorganize resources and to secure the commitments necessary to keep the
program going in a way that otherwise does not imperil UNO’s mission. Indeed,
delivery of this political science Ph.D. enhances that.
Slight correction, Dr. Saddow: Tulane University does not offer a PhD in Political Science, and has not for some time. They have recently begun an interdisciplinary PhD in "Political Development", but that's not quite the same thing. Otherwise, interesting analysis!
ReplyDelete-Tulane BA, Ole Miss PhD, Political Scientist