As part of his tax swap
proposal, Gov. Bobby
Jindal seeks to limit the usability of this device, which allows producers
to take 30 percent or more of their costs and use them to decrease one-to-one
Louisiana tax liability. This he hopes to accomplish by limiting the salary
range to $1 million for a production.
Which, of course, would rule
the high-priced talent needed to make such American Film Institute,
Smithsonian-destined cinema masterpieces such as Drive Angry and Olympus Has Fallen
impossible to qualify for much of their expenses. And has caused none other
than the state’s highest-priced bellhop, Secretary of Economic Development Stephen
Moret whose agency oversees then program, a past
vigorous defender of it, suddenly to
talk of altering the program to find efficiencies and better return on the
dollar.
That should prompt anybody who knows anything about the program to wonder what took so long for Moret to get the stars out of his eyes; even the tax-and-spend liberals at the Louisiana Budget Project figured this one out long ago. Since its inception, the program has given the state back roughly 14 cents for every dollar spent – a figure its proponents desperately wish to distract the public from, such as with the normally sensible state Sen. Elbert Guillory whining in a letter to the Jindal Administration about how it brings business worth $1.5 billion over the years – when in fact over a decade it has transferred roughly $500 million more in taxpayer resources to the wealthy in and out of the state than they managed to bring into the state.
Much has gone to
out-of-state interests in the form of selling these credits, which they can use
against only small Louisiana tax liabilities, to well-off Louisianans (such as to
a lawmaker and to a Public Service Commissioner) the prices
of which are guaranteed and brokered by the state. This has prevented income
tax receipts that should have gone in to state coffers instead to create artificial
employment, distorting more efficient uses of this capital either in the hands
of the state or by investors in other more productive ways, or into the hands
of out-of-state interests.
This also has served to
create a dependent class which believes in a divine right that its ability to
bring to screen any rubbish, no matter how much it costs the state, should
remain unmolested. Thus, something called the Louisiana
Film and Entertainment Association spins an apocalyptic scenario even
beyond those envisioned in Drive Angry
and Olympus Has Fallen by bemoaning the
loss of 10,000 jobs or more with the advent of these restrictions.
So what? If each of those
jobs cost the state $60,000 as estimated by the lefties at LBP – or almost the
equivalent of paying for an entire undergraduate degree for a student at
Louisiana State University Baton Rouge – if the state has to spend that money,
wouldn’t footing the bills of a qualified college student be a much better call
than on jobs that never will return even a fraction of that to state coffers?
(The study also claims that only about 2,500 jobs are created directly by the program
– a quarter of the total asserted by the hyperventilating LFEA.)
This program never has been
about cost effectiveness, and always about politicians being able to puff out
their chests in pride and mingling with the Hollywood glitter crowd – the fact
of which if you value intellectual discourse and moral behavior should make you
reach for an air-sick bag – and a tax break for the wealthy (of about 25
percent, as they pay 75 cents on the buck typically to credit holders). The
original intent behind it was to use it as a bridge to allow an indigenous
support industry to grow where Hollywood would want to employ it without any
state-organized bribery to get the moguls here. The point where that should have,
if it has, happened has been surpassed long ago.
No one has the right to make taxpayers fork over, in terms of forgone
state services or in the warping the economy away from more valuable pursuits
by their diversion, their resources in order to produce dreck, even if it’s occasionally
actually artistic. If the market doesn’t bear it, the state has no business
subsidizing inefficiency that doesn’t directly benefit all citizens. The selfish,
spoiled leeches at the LFEA and their sycophants political backers like
Guillory need to get over it.
No comments:
Post a Comment