tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10214951.post1054462878181944420..comments2024-03-17T08:07:12.695-05:00Comments on Between The Lines: Recusal reform, not public financing, best for judicial racesJeff Sadowhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03972004592729833310noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10214951.post-91516880728778724662008-09-30T09:31:00.000-05:002008-09-30T09:31:00.000-05:00T. Wong, I did not realize they allowed inmate acc...T. Wong, I did not realize they allowed inmate access at the Oakdale Federal pen?<BR/><BR/>You are correct in your analysis. I'd love to contribute to certain judgesif that meant I would not have to try cases before them. In Avoyelles Parish one lawyer has successfully conflicted out the less liberal judge by suing his homeowners insurance. Now all his cases go to the most liberal judge who awards more money in personal injury cases. <BR/>In one judge parishes, this would force the La Supreme Court to appoint pro tem judges at $500 per day is half of the cases. I agree there is an appearance of impropriety with campaign contributors practising before judges, but this is not the answer.Munghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06751646278822633116noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10214951.post-31808233516887956022008-09-29T20:44:00.000-05:002008-09-29T20:44:00.000-05:00What a wonderful idea. All I would need to do, th...What a wonderful idea. All I would need to do, then, is contribute to all of the judges that would not be philosophically aligned with my cause, contribute to them, and thereby cause their recusal from my cases.<BR/><BR/>Swing and a miss, Professor!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com