tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10214951.post6245744016857589287..comments2024-03-17T08:07:12.695-05:00Comments on Between The Lines: Ft. Polk social experiment risks negative consequencesJeff Sadowhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03972004592729833310noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10214951.post-57537106218203672532012-06-25T20:37:56.019-05:002012-06-25T20:37:56.019-05:00Absolutely shocking that in 2012 a college profess...Absolutely shocking that in 2012 a college professor can still spit such bigotry. Why is it that gays must first prove that their private commitments do not "damage military readiness" and not vice versa? Maybe we should make the bigots prove that two gays who commit to one another is somehow going to undermine the strength of the country. Your stupid assertion about "Allowing such an act also may detrimentally affect combat readiness" is the stupidest thing you've said in weeks. Here's something to thing about: in a generation or two, you stupid southern conservatives will finally catch up to the rest of the first world and embrace civility towards gays. Of course, the most conservative of you will be holdouts and cling to your prejudice. But the remainder of you will all profess that it is the conservatives who were the true champions of homosexual acceptance all along. Just like with the civil rights movement. Just like with women's rights. Also, lets be honest here, to say that commitment between two gays "cannot bring benefits to society" is total garbage, and even you know it. THis is simply culture war garbage. Your CMR even had the audacity to point towards gay acceptance as causing rape in the military. You should be embarrassed to link to such garbage. You truly have no shame whatsoever.Mr. Harris Plutocrathttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14272042050207617611noreply@blogger.com