tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10214951.post3431754707387549815..comments2024-03-17T08:07:12.695-05:00Comments on Between The Lines: No need for Jindal to give, Dardenne to get, endorsementJeff Sadowhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03972004592729833310noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10214951.post-48726358560259224932010-10-17T11:39:26.483-05:002010-10-17T11:39:26.483-05:00Great revelation from you, Jeff. Apparently, one s...Great revelation from you, Jeff. Apparently, one should never support any official "unless it helps both the endorser and endorsee politically." You even brag that Jindal does this. Maybe in your bubble political success is more important that moral integrity. I could tell that you're of this kind already, just from reading your blog. Most of the rest of us are different, though. In the olden days, honorable politicians would take a stand in spite of an unpopular position, and make it their work to convince people by reason. Lincoln, for example. Consider just how profoundly low Churchill's popularity reached in the years before WWII. But people like you worship the Palins of this world merely because their hatred is popular and annoys the liberals. People like you lack moral timber. <br /><br />By the way, I love the way you always dance around Vitter's "serious sin." What could this sin possibly be? Lets keep it vague and undefinedMr. Harris Plutocrathttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14272042050207617611noreply@blogger.com