The old aphorism that you never should quarrel with
somebody who buys ink by the barrel may become less and less valid with the
ascension of Republican Atty. Gen. Jeff
Landry to Louisiana governor next year.
Landry won outright the contest earlier this month
and has hit the ground running. Among the things he has begun preparing for is influencing
the new Legislature, set to have supermajorities of his party in both chambers,
in its selection of leadership with which he is comfortable. Already his
expressed preference for GOP state Sen. Cameron Henry appears
to have landed Henry the Senate presidency for next term.
But there’s still a House speakership up for
grabs, with multiple reports that Landry hasn’t stumped for a particular
individual but did provide input, accepted by the chamber’s GOP, that it settle
upon one candidate and that the membership vote only for that candidate when
the time comes in early January. In fact, Landry’s transition office released a
letter, signed by every Republican attempting to win that vote and Landry, agreeing
to that. This will prevent a scenario such as in 2020 when a
Republican-preferred Republican lost out to a Democrat-preferred Republican in
the speaker’s contest, which diluted GOP efforts to enact a conservative agenda
over the course of the term.
This story was reported succinctly from The
Hayride website, known as a conservative opinion site whose articles also
contain news. Almost simultaneously, about 11 hours after the letter was
produced, a story on the subject appeared on the Louisiana
Illuminator site, ostensibly a news site but which injects left-wing
opinion into its designated news articles.
Except that story was much less complete and
accurate about the events reported by The Hayride, written by its publisher
Scott McKay. Julia O’Donoghue, who once covered state politics for the New
Orleans Times-Picayune before it was subsumed into the Baton Rouge
Advocate chain, authored that one, which only mentioned the apparent half-dozen
speaker candidates – actually a later addition to the piece, where the original
had mentioned only two – met with Landry, without any mention of an agreement
or what it constituted or who was involved.
It's obvious what happened – the Hayride scooped
the Illuminator because the speaker candidates kept O’Donoghue in the dark
while alerting McKay, whom Landry also contacted. Landry generally is a fan of
Hayride pieces for its analysis of Louisiana politics and the site is viewed
widely by GOP legislators. By contrast, Illuminator pieces often attempt to
criticize conservative issue preferences, sometimes being extremely selective
in the information and data reported to slant stories if not making inaccurate
assertions, to prop up a leftist agenda.
Landry’s campaign frequently gave many media
outlets short shrift, particularly those it felt tending to inject bias against
him particularly and Republicans and conservatives generally. He and his campaign
generally ignored Illuminator attempts for information and sometimes stiffed
the Advocate and Gannett newspapers as well. He only participated in one
of several televised candidate forums organized by various media outlets and
interest groups, apparently without harming his campaigning.
This isn’t that surprising as technology
increasingly gives candidates and government officials the ability to cut out
intermediaries like the media to go directly to voters and citizens, while
preserving them the option to reward favored outlets with in-depth news and
leaving others flailing. As the media environment has become harsher for
survival of traditional outlets with readership declines, having a politician
treating an outlet unfavorably has reversed the relationship. Instead of the
media being able to savage officials who were uncooperative, now officials can starve
the media of the information that grabs consumers with little penalty but which
causes difficulty for the media they ignore.
Of course, the two channels can intertwine. On
several occasions, Landry authored opinion pieces that appeared on The Hayride.
And officials have the ability to cooperate selectively, as demonstrated since the
election with Landry and other Republicans appearing more willing at least toanswer Illuminator inquiries.
Regardless, within weeks from now in Louisiana media
outlets that traditionally have shown hostility towards a conservative agenda,
whether confined to opinion pieces, may find their news gathering in the realm
of politics significantly more challenging and operating at a disadvantage to
outlets that have demonstrated more tolerance, if not affinity, for disseminating
news and opinion that put conservative issue preferences in a favorable light. Actual
reporting, not mere stenography of talking points released by leftist
interests, might become more common among Louisiana’s media.